Sceenshot showing youtube premium family plan price increased from SGD17.98 to SGD27.98

Cant believe they are increasing the prices this much in one go, gonna be going back to adblockers.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m surprised more people aren’t using uBlock Origin. It’s an absolute necessity for browsing the web anymore.

    • ulkesh@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      When I can set that up for my AppleTV to block ads on YouTube, I’ll be happy to use it.

        • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          For which mobile and what extensions manager?

          I’m blocking ads phone-wide, I just don’t use uBlock Origin for that on the phone.

          • Malta Soron@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 month ago

            Firefox for Android has uBlock Origin (and lots of other useful extensions). You do need to set Firefox as the default app for YouTube links, but after that it works perfectly.

            • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I use NewPipe for Youtube, there are no ads at all.

              I use AdGuard for blocking ads phone-wide and if I hadn’t, Vivaldi has a built-in adblocker too.

              Bottom line is I don’t see any ads without using uBlock Origin. Original commenter is “surprised more people aren’t using” it like it’s the only way to go, while in reality it usable only in certain scenarios. It’s best for PC but not for mobile.

              • Findmysec@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                You’ve brought a strawman into the conversation, but in short, uBlock is best maintained and tends to be the most robust. Your solution works too

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            ublock is more efficient in the browser than any dns based blocking, as it can (and does) make changes to the website itself

              • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                you have said this

                I’m blocking ads phone-wide

                I wanted to let you know that such a countermeasure is not as effective as confining untrusted parties into a web browser with ublock

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        I honestly think it’ seven more important to have an adblock on a phone.

        The amount of pages that on mobile are an advert covering the top half, and a give us your data prompt at the bottom seems to be nearly everything these days. At least on a monitor there’s room for the content.

        • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I didn’t say I don’t block ads on the phone. Read my other comments here.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Firefox on android supports addons, so you can install uBlock on it too. If you use an apple device, you are limited to DNS based ad blocking, which doesn’t help with youtube.

      • Alice@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I really like YouTube Revanced on Android, it’s a patcher that includes an ad blocker as well as a ton of other QOL fixes.

        But I understand why more people don’t fuck with it, because if you install it wrong, your app will bug in the weirdest ways. Like my YouTube app kept getting renamed with the content of my last error message.

        • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          I use Revance Manager for patching other apps but youtube app is shit no matter how much you patch it. Prefer NewPipe or even LibreTube over patched Youtube app.

      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Same, but when I sit and do stuff in my laptop I end up procrastinating even more with it than my phone… Anyway, I block ads everywhere I can, and when I cannot, usually I have a pihole running in the background for that in my local network.

  • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have YouTube Premium though not the Family variant and Google won’t just fix their app. It is way behind NewPipe or YouTube ReVanced. No, I don’t need shorts. No I don’t need constant nudges to join groups of YouTubers by paying after I just paid you money, Google!

    What I want is system wide quality setting (what exactly does High or Data Saver mean; would it kill you to give 480p, 720p or 1080p as options) or Sponserblock integration (okay, this thing is probably never gonna happen but still). YouTube 's app is a stinking pile of shit. I just use YouTube Music from them and will cancel/not renew my plan after it lapses.

    • dillekant@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not a premium user but Youtube has poisoned its own waters with its algorithm. You can see the “top” content basically gaming that algorithm as well as it can. Literally every part of it from the title to the thumbnail to the content itself is hollow except for the skinner box.

    • eluvinar@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s funny, because sponsorblock and vanced only exist because of youtube’s greed. And now I can’t imagine using their service without them, even if they rollback the annoying ads. And they can’t implement them. It’s really the problem they made for themselves.

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      unpopular opinion: you can pay for premium and use Vanced/ReVanced because you value hosting infrastructure provided, and you understand that most of your money goes to the creators not google. And yet you still want control over the UI.

      And you know what. If everyone actually did that instead of using Vanced for adblocking, it maybe still would’ve been alive.

      • Test_Tickles@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        No it wouldn’t. They would have killed it anyway.
        Also, way to blame the victims for getting abused.
        “If only mommy would stop making daddy mad, then he would stop hitting mommy.”

        • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Victims?! You’re using someone’s infrastructure, very expensive programmer talent, countless content creators dedication; you’re using all of it for free, and you’re the victim when the other party tries to enforce a payment?

          People like you is why communism will never become a reality.

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s more so that you are allowed to try to block ads. If YouTube adds DRM or otherwise manages to stop usage of ad blocking, they are completely in their right to do so.

      IIRC if something runs on your system, you have the right to mess with it, however you want — e.g. block specific parts of the site, or use reader mode etc.

      • NuraShiny [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        If youtube does that, I will stop using the site and wait for a workaround to be written. You could preload the videos and cut out the ads, for example.

  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    I guess relatively few people still turn to piracy, it seems like all these streaming platforms are massively increasing their prices knowing that their customers will try to rationalise the extra spending somehow.

    • shani66@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I personally would read this as a sign that more people are turning to ad blocking or straight up leaving. Not enough money coming in so they have to jack prices up way faster than they’d likely do otherwise.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah but if they double the price and only lose 1/3 of their customers that is a profit. They are aiming for that equilibrium price and honestly more people are willing to pay to never have their entertainment end than we could ever hope for.

        • shani66@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I never accused them of being competent. They’re getting into a death spiral, but there still isn’t a very good and well known alternative to leech the disgruntled customer base.

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’ll have to be taught a hard lesson. But realistically family was overly generous with a lot of folks essentially paying 2$/m for premium. You can definitely double this amount without many of them bothering to pirate.

  • style99@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    To be fair, this does add more to the pot for YouTube creators.

    If you’re a YouTube Premium member, you won’t see ads, so we share your monthly membership fee with creators. Best of all, the more videos you watch from your favorite creators, the more money they make.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      So this has been true of YouTube Red since the beginning. It’s one if the reasons I got it. But they use watch time as the way to divide your money out. It actually makes it extremely unfair split for people that make great but short content. It’s also why longer content became more popular around that time and those 24/7 streams run like that.

      Also why creators started doing channels of just padded run time content of like building legos and eating things. It’s to secure better and funding.

      The current setup is pretty busted and feels like the wheels are coming off again.

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      YouTube has a transparent 70/30 revenue share model for creators.

      Your entire premium subscription fee is split into 70 to creators and 30 to google.

      The 70 are forwarded to the creators in proportion to the watch time.

      in fact it’s incorrect that “the more you watch, the more they earn”. You can only watch two videos in one month and each of the creators will earn the respective 4$

  • kratoz29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, once again they still hurt more the “legal” clients, nothing new really.

    I still happily have my ad-less YT experience in all the devices I own (as a matter of fact, I just convinced my girlfriend to sideload a YT client to get her a similar experience of mine in her iPhone).

  • Yuri addict@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    And of course this happened inline with the ads on pause so its either you pay us a fuck ton of money per month or suffer from advertisements thank god for ublock origin and firefox

  • BigLime@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Didn’t even know Youtube premium was still a thing. Been too busy using FreeTube, NewPipe, and SmartTube to notice

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    uBlock, Revanced, and yt-dlp still 100% free lol

    Content creators need to consider looking into alternative platforms though. Seems like YouTube is hellbent on self destruction.