Good bot

/s

Well, tracker2.postman.i2p just told me upon loading it that it’s under heavy load. In the past few days it seems to have a steady 1-2 dozen new torrents a day. The site has statistics but seemingly only for the past day, however this is roughly what I expected, or maybe less.

Hmm. I’m new enough that I don’t know past trends, so possibly. How far in the past you mean?

It would be interesting, if there was some kind of metric of activity, to see what effect it had when qbittorrent added support. Unfortunately it’s still very clucky and incomplete, but that’s mostly on libtorrent as I understand. Sometimes I wonder how would it be if it worked better, with DHT support.

I don’t use biglybt because I don’t have that much RAM. That is, I do have, but fucking windows is fucking aggressive with swapping for some fucking reason.

What’s with “anymore”? It’s still actively developed, there are regular releases of both the original Java I2P router and the 3rd party C++ router, if you mean that.

If you mean that it lacks content, please do upload there if you have something. If you already have the content on disk, it should only really take effort while you’re just starting to create torrents.

Don’t forget that

• I2P is the only semi-popular mixnet that’s suitable for torrents
• nobody will know it’s you who are uploading, so unless you upload info about yourself or you’re living in an extremely nonfree country (in which case the Java based router will set itself to restricted mode), you can’t really get into trouble for that

To me it seems more nuanced.

First, a VPN won’t solve much because this garbage will still be able to log connection periods (when you are home), signal strengths changing over time, (where are you in your home), and traffic bursts (when are you doing something on your phone or other devices). A VPN will just help a very little bit, by the devices having less visibility into what sites you visit. But this “solution” is like if people would have forced cameras into your house, and from that on you would only be going around while holding a towel in their line of sight to “disguise” you.

Second, this is not about mesh WiFi, as I understand. Install OpenWRT, and the mesh function of that won’t do any of this.
The problem is with new (but probably preexisting too) router brands who’s sole purpose is making all the unknowing customers into a product, but stealing their private life and giving it away for money (or anything else).
The problem is basically that a facebook-like company has got deep insight into your network, which you can’t avoid using, especially if your ISP forced you to use these garbage.

A VPN wouldn’t even help there. The spies are not in front of your door, but directly in your house.

The whole idea of device attestation is flawed. Majority of apps shouldn’t be dealing with it at all, but minding their own business.

Because paying is easy and convenient

I’ve just found out about the about:compat page in Firefox. It looks there’s a few dozen pages with user agent overrides in latest Firefox, some seem to be overridden to chrome. If you open a ticket on bugzilla, they might add an override to fix your environment too.

Yes, that should work too

Alias. To gr, even!

Isn’t that something that was basically taken over by corporate people?

I don’t think that PG’s and EFF’s standpoints are incompatible.

PG says this is not private.
EFF says this is better than google’s solution.
Being better than google’s solution does not mean that it’s now private.

That’s not a reasonable person. That’s an ignorant conspiracy theorist whose reality is grounded in delusion because right now advertisers take what they want and what they can get and the average user is depending on the browser to pay whack-a-mole with the invasive privacy tech they build and it’s not sustainable.

I’m afraid actually you are the ignorant corporate worshipper, whose reality is grounded in delusion, because ad tech companies will not ever stop using their already researched tracking and targeting techniques. For one, they have spent a lot of money on that research, the results are earning them a lot of money, and the business model of all of them is based on infinite growth, like cancer, so they’ll never stop using those techniques to switch to something inferior in their eyes.
You won’t be able to force them with legislation either. They’ll either find loopholes, make the loopholes, or just pay the small fines for the few cases they’ll receive, in any case treating the costs as the cost of business because it is still very profitable.

Parasites cannot be believed, if you have forgot.

There has never been a suggestion that Mozilla is planning to monetize PPA for themselves.

I think the user was speculating that Mozilla might want to embed ads in Firefox with this tech, or on their support and other websites.

The benefit is that it’s better than what we have now.

Saying this is like accepting a new form of tax from a government that’s widely known to be (monetarily) corrupt, in the hopes that with it they’ll be content and will stop stealing and privatizing public money.

Will be blocked just as well. These users need encrypted DNS, and honestly, not just them but everyone else too because of ISP tracking. dnscrypt or DoH is the solution.

Besides, with uBO (or a custom addon or userscript) you can replace the value of that list, for all sites or selectively

Websites don’t get to see what addons are you running

There’s plenty of good reasons to transfer update ownership to the Play Store, too.

I’m interested, can you give a few examples?

Besides, it’s optional. Options are a good thing to have.

That’s true, until it’s not an option because a “bug” converts your apps to play store builds, and until this option gains a non-optional feature that nags you every x days to googlify your apps and expects that at some point you will either accept or misclick it. This is not something unheard of, play protect already does this.

Besides what the other user said, they recently made it a requirement for accredited phone services that they destroy any samsung phones along with their data, that they receive for servicing, if they have found that the user has done “unauthorized servicing” on it.
This is the next step after making the phones practically impossible to be disassembled, which they have done years ago.