• nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    All right all right, I get why this is kind of funny and perhaps it’s potentially a bad sign for humanity.

    But consider an adult who’s learning the English language and is still at a basic level. If they want reading practice, they are often stuck with kids books. This would make practice a lot more interesting.

        • verdigris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Except the simplified versions are made by humans who can preserve the flavor of the language and the important meanings, unlike this tool which is like replacing the Mona Lisa with text that says “woman sitting”.

      • cheddar@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        In English yes. But the less popular the language is, the less materials there are. With this you can take any book and simplify it to your level. Unlike mass-produced books, AI can be very flexible.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Unfortunately that popularity directly translates to the AIs ability to digest and paraphrase a book. LLMs have been trained on what is available in computer text format, which means mostly internet sources. English has an outsized presence on the internet compared the to actual number of native speakers, so there’s magnitudes more training data for it than any other language. The models of other languages will be severely limited, if AI companies have spent the resources to train them at all.

          • cheddar@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            There are many AI companies, including those that are based in countries where people communicate in other languages. What you are saying is not an insurmountable problem.

            • flavia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yes it is insurmountable. There is not enough non-english text in the world to be able to train an LLM.

      • nucleative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Now, 100% of books and all media is simplified and accessible to anybody who can get access to this tool

    • probableprotogen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      There are SOME uses for this, but I still suspect its just going to fuel the already piss literacy levels in the United States. Albeit, for people learning English as a second language this is a legitimate use-case imo

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        People reading more might actually make them better readers, Even if it’s too simple for your standards!

      • UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        With the single example provided I’d say it did okay. Obviously in context that may change, but I don’t see this as much different from someone reading cliffs notes or something like blinkist.