• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    I’ve used Linux for 25 years now and I remember every time when back then people needed help with windows it was always "go to the registry editor and add the key djrgegfbwkgisgktkwbthagnsfidjgnwhtjrtv in position god-knows-where to fix some stupid windows shit. that, apparently, made windows user ready

    On Linux I’d have to edit an English language file and add an English word and that meant it wasn’t user ready

    Yeah, Linux was ready long ago

  • OR3X@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    But it’s not ready because insert niche use case that only applies to me and no, I will not seek out open source alternatives to insert closed source software

  • Nugscree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The main problem still is that for some configuration you still need to use the CLI, the average user does not want to touch that no matter how powerful it is, they want a fully functional GUI that lets you so exactly the same thing but by clicking on buttons. Pair that with drivers that either do not exist or will not work for (some) of your hardware, odd crashed like the Bluetooth stack crapping out and not working anymore until you restart the system, or the system that hangs from hibernation with a black screen. So unless those hurdles are tackled the Linux adoption rate will stay low because the average user wants a system that works, and not one they have to debug.

    I’ve been on and off different distros of Linux since Ubuntu 6 using Pop_OS! as my daily driver for work a few years now, and the same problems I had then are still here today which is a shame honestly.

  • Ronno@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The problem is that Linux is only ready in certain cases. For me, it isn’t there yet, because I can’t use it for my gaming machine. Every time this is brought up, Linux enthusiast shrug it off as “no big deal”, you can game on Linux, just the games that use kernel level anti-cheat won’t work. Well yeah, that’s a bit the issue, I still like to play some of those games you see?

    Meanwhile, I have Linux Mint running on a laptop that I bring on vacation. I don’t game on that one. Then Linux works just as well as any other OS, no issue.

  • Elkot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Before I bought a Steam Deck I had never used Linux but now I really like it, honestly I’m tempted to install SteamOS on my PC as it’s only ever used for gaming anyway

  • iwasnormalonce@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    How do I make the change less scary? I made my pc like 10 years ago and not looked at it since. I just use it for personal admin now and Rome 2 total war twice a year.

  • ZMoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Ok, I’ll bite. I tried Ubuntu a few months ago. Logging into Eduroam was a bit of a process, but eventually I figured it out and it worked. Then one day the internet didn’t work and I had no idea why. Something to do with the network drivers. Then I was trying to use OpenOffice (or LibreOffice? The one that came with the OS), and I use Zotero for references. The Zotero plugin had a bunch of glitches that made me not trust it. The Internet (back on Windows) assured me that it worked fine, but it was way glitchier than the Windows version.

    The bottom line is that I just need this stuff to work because I don’t have time to debug. I love the idea though; maybe I was using the wrong distro.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Tried it again a few months ago when HDR support first dropped in KDE. It didn’t work at all. Everything was desaturated and dim. Literally the opposite of what HDR is supposed to do.

    I’m giving it another year before I try Linux again. Hopefully the bugs are sorted by then.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I stopped using Linux on my desktop PC in 2007. Last year I switched back, and wow everything is so much smoother now. Video, sound, webcam, networking, all worked perfectly out-of-the-box. No more messing with fglrx for hours to get ATI/AMD graphics working. No more figuring out ALSA vs OSS vs PulseAudio vs whatever else. I don’t know what the sound subsystem is even called now, because I don’t need to know. It just works.

    KDE is beautiful now, too. I tried a few desktop environments and liked KDE the best.

    Great time to switch. I’ve been using Linux on servers since 1999, but it’s totally viable for desktops these days too.

  • teuto@lemmy.teuto.icu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    The average ‘advanced’ window user: CLI is scary!

    Also the average ‘advanced’ windows user: if you open regedit and add this DWORD entry to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/Microsoft/application/windows/something, then you can stop Microsoft from screwing you, but it’ll revert after each update so you gotta keep fixing it

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Let’s be real. Most people can’t really use Windows, either. Anything harder than clicking the Chrome icon is beyond most users.

  • drascus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I have had people tell me " I dont feel like building my own OS from scratch " I’m like what are you even talking about?