Not sure if this is the correct place to post, but I just wanna kinda rant a bit.

I’m not the only one that hates this, right?

An app can just do a “This App Does Not Allow Screenshots”? Like… wtf?

Like, its my phone, and some app can just decide to disable a fuction of my phone. It’s my phone and if I wanna take a screenshot, I’m taking a screenshot. I don’t care about whatever “security” the app developer wants.

Imagine if every online shopping app whether fast food or amazon, just used this to block you from taking a screenshot so you can’t save the records in case of a dispute.

Which android developer thought it was a good idea to let an app disable a function on your phone. Even iPhone doesn’t have this stupid concept.

Sorry for the rant.

Anyone wanna share your stories?

(P.S. I have a cheap secondary phone to take photos of the screen. “This App Does Not Allow Screenshots” my ass lmao, I’m taking the screenshot whether the app wants it or not.

  • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ironically, Google’s new creepy Circle to Search feature gets to override the screenshot denial lockout that Google themselves created.

    • ouch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Of course. When you run a monopoly, you get to make your own rules.

      EU should force Google to open Android back up.

  • Fribbtastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    Man, my banking app recently switched to a different keyboard. One that doesn’t allow integrations like bitwarden. I also cannot copy paste my password into the password field so I have to enter my 32 character password by hand.

    Mind you, this is not an app that does ANY banking in the first place it is just to authorize access to my bank account or for transactions.

    So it is always a few minutes copying the password, making sure I haven’t miss-typed on the shitty keyboard or because of my sausage fingers and then being logged out of my bank account in the browser because it took so much time copying that password.

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    The only apps where this makes any sense are dating apps and similar social apps where a level of social vulnerability is more likely.

    Otherwise agree that all others are BS.

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah that makes sense too but those are also reasonable to have as a protected setting to turn on/off. I think the post is pointed at involuntary blocking.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t have much to add other than my agreement. They’ve been tightening the noose around our necks little by little for years now. But don’t worry, screenshots and copying and pasting text will return…as a microsubscription! /s

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    you can bypass this with a rootkit

    i think they do it for security reasons. if you can take screenshots of sensitive data, so can malware. however, you should be able to disable it for netflix for example.

    • serenissi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Netflix and other streaming apps do it to prevent screen recording their ‘premium’ content. These use DRM too and the region of protected content shows in black in scrcpy. These apps are much hostile to users much beyond screenshot and shouldn’t be used anyway. Most movies and shows can be pirated from torrent, illegal streaming sites or simply telegram in good quality and watched in say vlc for much better experience than these crappy apps provide.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I respect your opinion, but I see it differently.

        Paying for entertainment and content like well-made animations makes sense to me. After all, paying for content is some kind of democratic participation, choosing what is produced. I didn’t mind pirating a lot when I was younger and didn’t have the money to pay for something anyways, but now i prefer to do things “the right way”.

        • serenissi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’ve no problem with paying the artists of the great contents I enjoy. I think they deserve the support and praise. What I (and we should IMO) hate is user subjugating behaviour the streaming apps and hollywood studios impose. I’d pay for the content and the bandwidth of the streaming/downloading service. Better yet, pay per download like netflix dvd days.

          Digital restriction management has been proven ineffective for piracy. And piracy is the only way I get good quality content in accessible way. For example due to DRM netflix will not run on any of my devices above 720p no matter what I pay. There’s simply no way I can pay the artists directly AFAIK.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      i think they do it for security reasons.

      Yet, on iOS, the same app can’t. So it is more like, “ooh a button to twiddle, I’ll twiddle it!”

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        A better way to handle that would be for “taking screenshots when other apps have focus” to be a special permission that needs to be explicitly granted. Could even make it app specific (ie, “I allow app x to take screenshots or record the display/audio of apps y and z”).

        Just like arbitrary apps shouldn’t have access to look at the clipboard or full file system whenever they want.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Good idea for a finance app (which could helpfully ask me for a confirmation) - but sloppy as a general justification for dictating what a user can or can’t do. (But go off I guess)

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    You can bypass this crap, but you’ll need to root your phone to achieve that.

    Afterwards you’ll need to install magisk (superuser app) and a bunch of plugins: play integrity fix and playcurl_next (to simulate that your phone is unrooted), and then FlagSecurePatcher (which is the actual module that’s overriding the screenshot block.

      • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        If you root your phone, you give root access to any malware you run across as well. So don’t use your phone for anything that you don’t want to end up on some darkweb forum.

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Rubbish, the superuser app will prompt you if an app asks for permissions, and you need to grant it manually. The warning message is distinctively different from regular popups, and there is a 5 second cooldown timer before you can click it, to make sure it’s not happening accidentally.

  • mayhair@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Samsung Internet and Iceraven (probably Firefox, Mull, etc. as well) both disable screenshots in their private modes by default. Thankfully, you can disable this functionality in their settings.

  • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    You can root your phone to remove all security features, if you don’t mind malware having full access to your data. You should probably cancel your debit and credit cards if you do, and lock your credit score, cause if you’re doing stuff like that you won’t have to wait long till Have I Been Pwned notifies you you’re in a data breach.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Many (maybe even all) banking apps won’t even install or launch if your phone is rooted.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Yea… I though about rooting, but heck no, too much security problem, I don’t want more anxiety. Guess I’ll just have to keep use my cheap secondary phone to take pictures as a workaround… 😓

  • Bezier@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    The point of many of android’s “protection” features isn’t to protect the user from apps, but to protect apps from the user. I hate it.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      In this case, I think it’s protecting apps from other apps. No secret screen recording going on while you’re looking at bank statements, etc. I find that annoying, too, but I’m less annoyed by the reasoning in this case.

      Now if Google could explain why toggling wifi through Tasker requires root, I would LOVE to hear the reasoning…

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Now if Google could explain why toggling wifi through Tasker requires root, I would LOVE to hear the reasoning…

        tbf all hardware-functions require root permission by default.

        Linux does the same thing. If you want to access /dev/sda, it requires root.

        I could guess one of the ways it could interfere with security is that it would probably also allow the app to disable WiFi. If the app does that, it could incur costs as now data is being transmitted over mobile connectivity. Also, it would maybe allow the app to find your mobile-IP address, which could be used to geotrack you. But i don’t know, i’m just talking out of my ass here.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 days ago

          The first two don’t bug me but dam, give me my 6 buttons back!! I hate these fat notification tray icons. And yes, fuck Google for making it take MORE clicks to toggle wifi/cellular than before.

          • Spectrism@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            Unless they changed something in Android 15, which I haven’t been able to try yet, I don’t think the separate WiFi / Mobile Data tiles were ever removed. At least they still exist on LineageOS 21 (Android 14), just hidden in the tile editor. You might want to check if you still have them there.

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                That’s probably your mobile connection? Are you translating or does an English android say “Internet”?

                What’s the symbol?

                There’s also an option you can turn on that allows you pulling the menu down from the right side of the top of the screen, and you get the whole menu. I tried linking but for some reason I haven’t been able to upload images with my new phones for some reason. And then pulling down from the left side will just bring down the normal menu.

                You can also reorganise the tiles so you have your most used in the quick bar.

                • glimse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  It literally says “Internet” and is for both wifi and cellular data. You click it and the popup shows toggles for both along with available wifi networks and while I have organized the tiles so Internet is the first option, there is no option to separate the two. Airplane Mode is a separate tile

                  Pixel 7 Pro with Android 15

      • Jiří Král@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        In this case, I think it’s protecting apps from other apps. No secret screen recording going on while you’re looking at bank statements, etc.

        I think with all the engineers at Google developing Android they could come up with a solution of how to discern whether the act of screenshot was triggered solely by the user, or an app on the phone. They are the ones in power of all the APIs that allow other apps to capture the screen content in the first place. Maybe I am simplifying it too much, but this seems as a bad excuse to me.

        Maybe it would be too hard of a solution since there’s so many ways third party apps could capture screen content (including for example the Android accessibility service which also allows apps to read content of the screen and even simulate screen touches and gestures which many automation apps make use of) that blocking the screenshot alltogether is by far the most feasible solution.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          There is already a solution:

          Third-party apps, unless a user specifically go to settings and find that option, don’t have the permission known as “Draw Over Top” that’s required to do screen recordings/screenshots.

          So by default, a user is already safe from a malicious app trying to steal info. (That is, unless they just be an idiot and give the app “Draw Over Top” permission)

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            the permission known as “Draw Over Top” that’s required to do screen recordings/screenshots.

            That’s not exactly intuitive. I had no idea that permission would allow an app to take screenshots. The warnings given on the permission screen mention other risks, but not that one.

            • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Well you are gonna be trusting the password manager anyways, since its literally storing all your passwords. If you trust Bitwarden to store all your passwords, then you can trust it to not abuse the “Draw Over Top” permission.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          For me and my family, I think the best solution would be to leave it as-is but with a way to lift the restrictions for power users that doesn’t involve root access. Something akin to enabling developer mode without having to buy a specific rootable phone

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        They changed it the other day where airplane mode doesn’t require root. That one’s nice for me.

        Never mind that shortcuts on iOS has been able to do that simple task from its inception.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Third-party apps, unless a user specifically go to settings and find that option, don’t have the permission known as “Draw Over Top” that’s required to do screen recordings/screenshots.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Fair enough, though experience with my unsavvy family makes me think a lot of people will do whatever an app tells them to do

      • dingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Ok but why is my browser doing this in incognito mode? Incognito mode isn’t a banking app. It’s me not wanting my browser to save my Facebook login info or history.

        • kn33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          The target use case for incognito mode is to prevent the device from saving your activity during the browsing session through things like cookies and history. To that end, incognito also blocks it to prevent other apps from saving your activity through screen recordings or screenshots.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 days ago

      “Protections” are fine, as long as there’s an override for it.

      User doesn’t like potential malware from “sideloading”? Then don’t enable “Install from Unknown Sources”.

      Same thing with everything else, there should be an override switch.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        yeah just like with mounting EFI vars on linux…

        it should be possible because “root can do anything, really”, but also, it’s dangerous and should be disabled by default.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 days ago

      Being able to block screenshots is “supposed” to protect users from having malware take screenshots of banking apps and other such information.

      If app developers were good, this could have been a good feature.

      But I agree with OP. It still should be the user’s choice.

      • Klajan@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 days ago

        My Banking App does have the option to disable this feature.

        It’s all fine if it’s a user choice, very annoying if it’s not.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    8 days ago

    I fuckin hate that Playstation 4 and 5 do this for taking screenshots from movies. I just want to get a good screen grab for meme purposes! Do you think I’m going to screen shot every goddamn frame of a movie, one at a time, paste those back together as a video, then somehow rip the audio too, and then share this necromantically-assembled abomination with all my pirate buddies? Fuck you!

  • beerclue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I work for a company that builds an app /sdk that handles credit cards / payments. It’s one of the (many) requirements for getting an industry standard certification (like PCIDSS / MPOC). The app Must block screenshots, and Must disable the camera while using it…

    • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      What on earth are those in charge of certification standards thinking they’ll achieve with requirements like this?

          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            tbh the security settings on desktop devices tend to be more lax in general; for example almost any desktop pc has an open bootloader, means you can sideload an operating system from usb. The consequence is that no password-at-login will protect your private data; only full disk encryption can.

            Smartphones on the other hand often have a fully-locked bootloader, which means it’s totally non-trivial to install an alternative operating system. especially, it often contains wiping any data on the smartphone, so an attacker with access to the device can’t simply install their own OS and read the internal storage.

      • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 days ago

        The same functionality that you use to take screenshots can be hijacked by bad actors to get access to your stuff. It’s especially bad if they can see your MFA apps or other sensitive info.

        Not saying the functionality is always used for the best of intentions, but there are many situations where I see it as necessary.

      • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Accidentally screenshotting your bank acct and routing number is the only one I can really think of.

        • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          8 days ago

          Or your “time clock earth sounds” app from the not so well policed appstore takes silent background screenshots, grayscales them and sends them to their host for OCR.

          I agree this permission is annoying. But I differ in I feel it should be system controlled and can be invoked by apps that identify specific fields to be blocked, instead ofnjusy disabling it outright.

      • smeenz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Probably a nod to the written style of RFC definitions, which have the word entirely in capital letters, as in… the implementation MUST do such and such, and SHOULD do this other thing. In this case, the relevant security standard(s)

  • HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    8 days ago

    That’s nothing. My workplace disabled copy/paste on everyone’s work iPhones completely. Not in their own apps but system wide. Apparently that’s something ios allows them to do. Doesn’t affect me much because I use the phone as a glorified dual auth token but some people have it as their primary phone.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      work iPhones

      some people have it as their primary phone.

      Bruh, I have no idea how people can put up with their employer being able control their device. Like… the employer can freak out about some perceived “security breach” and decide to wipe everyone’s phone and you lose all your data like photos. Also, their employer can see if they are shit talking about the employer or mangement people, and it’s a terrible idea if they want to unionize.

      • Pfeffy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        They are okay with it because it isn’t their phone. It’s a free phone that comes with the job.

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          “Free”

          hmm I rather not… like its not just “privacy” you’d have to worry about, there can be potentially a rogue employee of the company just stealing all your bank info and possibly steal your identity. Might be a “free” phone, but there’s just much more risks than just getting a cheap android phone. People don’t think this though and only think about the “free”. Dealing with identity theft is not fun. If only people understand the risks… 🤦‍♂️

          • solrize@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Don’t put personal stuff on your work phone. Use your own phone for that. If you have trouble carrying both, hit the gym.

            • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Yea exactly. I would just carry 2 phones, but I’m just saying: I don’t understand how other people just use their work phone for personal use simply because it’s “free”

              • frostysauce@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                7 days ago

                Obviously they are less concerned about things you are quite concerned about. I’m sure there are things that concern them and that you don’t give a shit about.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 days ago

          As another guy that does, yeah we can push ediscovery apps to the phone and pull all kinds of data

          • Tricky@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 days ago

            Something I’ve been dying to ask an industry expert. If your users setup a second user profile on android , and exclusively uses the second profile for work-related apps (assume full control), can you see the contents of the first (unrelated) user profile?

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      I have never heard of copying and pasting being disabled in iOS. I’m sorry, but this claim is dubious.

  • BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I like that it’s possible, but I think it should be treated like a permission with a user accessible toggle in settings for each app.

    • Jiří Král@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I would like to see the same thing for clipboard read access. In the same way app has to prompt you for location permission it would have to prompt you to read the clipboard and you would actually have the option to allow it all the time which is handy for some apps like clipboard manager, or don’t allow it alltogether which is handy for some random apps you don’t trust.