Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoGit good, sonslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square175fedilinkarrow-up11.25Karrow-down147
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1external-linkGit good, sonslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square175fedilink
minus-squareinv3r510n@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·2 days agoPretty sure calling women “females” is given the side eye in every English dialect.
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoMales, females. What’s wrong with that?
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·22 hours agoThat’s quite subjective. I’m pretty sure when I say “I talked to the male around the corner” people won’t start assuming I talked to a dog, pigeon, or snake.
Pretty sure calling women “females” is given the side eye in every English dialect.
Males, females. What’s wrong with that?
It’s dehumanizing.
That’s quite subjective. I’m pretty sure when I say “I talked to the male around the corner” people won’t start assuming I talked to a dog, pigeon, or snake.