I know MediaBiasFactCheck is not a be-all-end-all to truth/bias in media, but I find it to be a useful resource.

It makes sense to downvote it in posts that have great discussion – let the content rise up so people can have discussions with humans, sure.

But sometimes I see it getting downvoted when it’s the only comment there. Which does nothing, unless a reader has rules that automatically hide downvoted comments (but a reader would be able to expand the comment anyways…so really no difference).

What’s the point of downvoting? My only guess is that there’s people who are salty about something it said about some source they like. Yet I don’t see anyone providing an alternative to MediaBiasFactCheck…

  • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It suggested Al Jazeera has a leftist bias, despite Al Jazeera being funded by Qatar the furthest thing from being a leftist government. It is biased against any non-Western sources.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The Al Jazeera and Fox News comparison is why I don’t trust that site. I don’t think Al Jazeera isn’t a biased organization, but I do consider them somewhat factual. I also think I’m not the only one because you often see people linking to Al Jazeera. However when it comes to Fox News I think most people would agree that Fox news is far from accurate. It’s not exactly Newsmax, but if someone linked Fox News I think most people would definitely question the facts of the article.

      And then we get to mediabiasfactcheck where Al Jazeera is considered just as factual as Fox News. It’s one of those situations where you have to question who exactly is in the wrong? Is Al Jazeera really that factually incorrect? Is Fox news more factual than people believe? Or is mediabiasfactcheck wrong? I’m not against being wrong but from my years of being on the web I’d say it’s the last option.

      • otp@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I understand that Fox News has so many subsidiaries that might be muddying the “overall” rating. But I agree with you. I’d trust Al Jazeera over Fox News any day.

    • gigachad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      I guess that is also a shortcoming of the left/right scale. Al Jazeera is super popular among leftists on Lemmy, as they do a lot of Anti-Israel propaganda.

        • gigachad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          The term propaganda makes no implications about true or false. This is not a discussion about truth but bias. Propaganda is when you push your ideology using communicative methods like loaded language.

          News agencies like Al Jazeera do exactly this. This is not unexpected as it sits in Qatar and wants to be the mouthpiece of the arab world. Saying they do propaganda is not a bad thing per se, but readers should be aware of this.

        • Preflight_Tomato@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It is not propaganda if it is true.

          Something can be true and propaganda. If reporting is misrepresenting a situation using purely true information and events, then it’s propaganda. It’s misrepresentation that makes something propaganda, not truthfulness.

          Note: This is not a comment on whether I think Lemmy/Al Jazeera is doing propaganda.

        • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          They can report only one side over and over again and focus on the emotional impact, include “people say” or qualify rumors or speculations or exaggerations so that it’s still factual reporting, while completely ignore the other side. That is what you see Israel and US MSM doing. Humans have biases and can easily be manipulated.

          I suspect that Al Jazeera is still mostly on it’s “best behavior” trying to establish itself but ultimately it’s controlled by Quatar and not free. That still makes it incredibly valuable because it’s not controlled by US empire.

          • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Your link states Israel says they’re a Hamas operative. Al Jazeera says that isn’t true.

            I’m gonna err on the side of the journalists that Israel is actively targeting instead.

    • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They had a children’s channel that unfortunately no longer exists. I was lucky enough to watch it when I had the chance.

      Yes, it was THAT Al Jazeera.