• beerclue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    No one will say 3.658m. We would say about 3.5m or 3 and a half meters. I’m pretty sure those 12’ are not exact either. You wouldn’t say 11 feet, 5 and 1/32 inches, right?

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Okay, 3.5 meters is not any more inherently comprehensible than 12 feet.

      I’m not denying the superiority of metric, I wish the US would just switch over already. However, unless you already know how long a meter or foot is in reality, you won’t have a good idea how high she can jump. Relating it to something makes it a lot easier to understand. Jumping 35 books is a terrible analogy, but jumping over 2 tall men would work pretty well.

      • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Having the units in imperial and metric is much more comprehensible for most people compared to imperial and a large number of books of which I don’t even know how thick they are

      • sheogorath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well, if you’re already familiar with the metric system, you can probably guess how long a meter is. It’s like when you’re used to the imperial system and you can guess how long a foot is or something like that.