• ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The standard fine for violating the STOCK Act is $200, but frequently the House Committee on Ethics and the Senate Select Committee on Ethics waive the fee.

    Craig Holman, a Capitol Hill lobbyist on ethics and campaign finance rules for nonprofit Public Citizen, said the fee is one of two reasons why the STOCK Act is frequently violated.

    “The penalty is so minimal that these millionaire members of Congress really don’t care about it," Holman told Raw Story. “The second provision is the ethics committees are not really enforcing it or taking it seriously.”

    So basically this “law” is just a suggestion.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      5 months ago

      So the penalty for insider trading is $200. That’s just a Pay to Play fee for illegal market trading. Let’s put some jailtime on that act, FFS.

      • Etterra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Remember, that law was written by those who it will affect most. They’ll never make it more than a slap on the wrist.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Some background information for those interested: the top traders in congress this year are 50:50 DNC and GOP, top trader was DNC Brian Higgins until he left office this year. Generally GOP do place higher but former speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi also often makes the top ten given she married the owner of an investment firm when they were both in college, 25 years before she entered congress, and they have joint assets.

          The law, 2011-2012 S.2038 - STOCK Act, was introduced by Independent Democrat Senator Joseph I. Lieberman. It had 1 roll call in the house, 417 to 2, and 13 roll calls in the senate with many changes and amendments proposed until it passed 96 to 3.

          Personally, I don’t expect anything to ever come from the STOCK act in terms of punishments, but I’m happy that we have it or we wouldn’t even be having these conversations in the first place.

      • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        The standard fine for violating the STOCK Act is $200, but frequently the House Committee on Ethics and the Senate Select Committee on Ethics waive the fee.

        The penalty is $200, but only if they feel like paying it.

  • UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    5 months ago

    Fun fact: NASA employees are unable to even talk with congressional representatives about proposed scientific missions because it is considered a “conflict of interest”. Let that sink in. Meanwhile…

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 months ago

    identified as having violated the STOCK Act during 2023-2024

    To be specific, these are people who didn’t file required financial disclosures on time during those years.

    If a congressman committed insider trading, but filed disclosure and paperwork on time, they wouldn’t be counted here

  • lemmyman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Just because I was curious: I counted 23 R, 22 D, 1 I. That might be off by one or two but I was surprised (well maybe not really) how evenly split it was

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      As someone who’s done a ton of work getting companies to be SOX compliant I have a fresh new hatred for our system of government. I get a new one just about every day at this point.