Edit: Oops, it is /r/Tennessee, not /r/ProgressiveHQ

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wow. Just fucking wow.

    Does Facebook and X do similar types of censoring when it comes to the Republican agenda?

    Or is it somehow easier to install them as mods on Reddit subs, making it appear to be more “grass roots” without blaming the platform itself for censorship and bias?

    I guess of fb you have “groups” (as opposed to subs) where you could install similar “mods.”

    • pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think left wing content on Xitter just gets suppressed, not deleted. Since buying a checkmark gets your posts boosted to the top of the algorithm, and right wingers are far more likely to give money to the Nazi bar.

      But, I haven’t used it in a long time, so I could be mistaken. When I gave up on it, I was being shown almost nothing but alt right shit regardless of how many accounts I blocked/muted or what posts I interacted with, though. (And pretty much the only other content I’d get was porn and gore that I didn’t want to see.) And every search would show me a hearty mix of Nazi propaganda and porn, no matter how irrelevant.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Reddit moderation has been pretty comprehensively captured by bad actors.

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Facebook, Twitter and Reddit all have a history of silencing by shadowbans and most people have no idea. There’s a billion different ways to silence you on each of these.

    • ronl2k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Designing an opinion platform with “volunteer” mods is asking for agenda-driven operatives to volunteer.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        especially when you boot out all the volunteers with accessibility needs over API monetization that was clearly just meant to kill off API usage.

    • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      X probably does. Facebook seems to be more impartial. Not that it speaks much against Zuck’s support for the administration.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        New study shows just how Facebook’s algorithm shapes conservative and liberal bubbles

        The answer seems to be yes. After analyzing popular political news links posted on the platform between September 2020 and February 2021, the researchers found that there’s not much overlap between political news consumption within the two camps. Segregation also increases as a news link moves from being selected by the algorithm, to being seen by a user, to being interacted with.

        That ideological gap was larger than what other research has shown for overall news consumption online and in traditional media.

        “This borders on an indictment of Facebook’s algorithm,” said Laura Edelson, a computer scientist and postdoctoral researcher at NYU. She was not involved with the project but has done similar research and reviewed the studies’ findings. (In 2021, Edelson and her team were blocked from accessing Facebook after a clash over the data they were collecting.)

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I assume with X you need to directly manipulate the algorithm to manipulate what appears in feeds. Which means you don’t have this plausible deniability by blaming a third party mod. OTOH it’s more difficult for a user to detect the platform doing algorithm manipulation and call out the platform because it’s just a black box to them.

    • Tilgare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would expect Twitter to be a huge conservative circle jerk, but it really is not. I think the fighting between the two sides is good for business. I also would expect TikTok to do so as well, and maybe it will once Ellison takes over, but so far that’s the best boots on the ground source for seeing real events happening in real time, even if it conflicts with whatever bullshit narrative is spun out of the event.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Is Oracle really going to host TikTok? That’s been a rumor for like two years now. Even if they do host it on their servers, what kind of administrative or moderation control are they expected to have?

        • Tilgare@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I don’t know about hosting - but the deal was being finalized a little over a month ago and it was reported that Oracle would manage the security and algorithm after the purchase of TikTok US. Or at least, they will be licensing the algorithm if they won’t own it. The new development I was unaware of is that it won’t just be Larry Ellison, but also Rupert Murdoch and Michael Dell. We truly live in hell.