• Sundiata@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    We’ve been hearing this for years.

    I am ready to have a hot confrontation with a pack of rabid hyenas.

    …actually, that didn’t sound right.

    you know what? I’ll just leave.

  • Jumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Interesting that this comes at a time when resistance against raising the military budget us growing. That must be a total coincidence…

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    Putin is testing for years how far he can go. He uses salami tactics on NATO for ages.

    A bit of sabotage here, planes and drones flying in or over NATO territory, ghost ships and shadow fleets doing crimes, disturbing GPS, etc, etc, etc.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        He still has the dangerous bits. The question is, though, how dangerous they still are…

        • rozodru@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t think they work anymore. I would have thought he would have used a small one by now especially after Ukraine made advances into Russian territory.

          But what the fuck do I know, I’m just a guy front of a monitor speculating on things I’m not qualified to speculate on.

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think the vast majority will just fizzle. Still, it is a risk with the few that might work.

  • Lumisal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    A bunch of European businesses are still doing business with Russia, so doubt it’s true.

  • dwalin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Remember that they want Europe to be afraid and stockpile material that otherwise would go to ukraine.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    Define “ready”, Martin Jaeger. They’re second best in Ukraine, so it can’t be in terms of capacity to win.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      If you disregard ability to win, any one of us is technically ready to attack Europe.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        When they are under the Phutatorius Law, I will demand tributes of charcuterie, stinky cheese and Belgian monk beer. Also some good doctors and personal trainers to keep me from becoming too much of a lard-ass while enjoying the spoils.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          You’d have a better chance than most armies, because they might actually let you in like that.

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      They still have their usual ‘wunderwaffle’ to roll out - Waves of Humans and zero care for human lives.

      Russia is as dangerous now as Japan was in WW2.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Japan had an aircraft carrier fleet rivaling the US, better carrier fighter planes than the US, and were occupying a lot of China, who was a peer opponent. It also took a US-USSR alliance to take them down.

        Russia on the other hand is able to wreak a lot of havoc, and is also good on some technological fronts, like drone warfare, espionage and ballistic missiles, but it has recently lost a lot of its fleet against an opponent with no navy, and is stuck in trench warfare with equipment that in WWII would be the equivalent of muskets.

        This whole posturing is because Russia ran out of easily recruitable people, and needs internal justification to start throwing in conscripts as well.

        Oh, BTW it’s “Wunderwaffe”, if you want a “Wunderwaffle”, go to Brussels, they put strawberries and cream on it so high it won’t fit in your mouth.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Also, their foreign trade is going down the shitter because their ability to export fossil fuels has been heavily curtailed by Ukraine.

        • Oh, BTW it’s “Wunderwaffe”, if you want a “Wunderwaffle”, go to Brussels, they put strawberries and cream on it so high it won’t fit in your mouth.

          Oh hell yeah. I know where I’m going for breakfast in the morning.

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 days ago

    I mean this was true 20 years ago, it wasn’t as obvious before they invaded Georgia in 2008 (let alone now), but multi decade research (including research that accounts for preference falsification) has clearly shown a consistent level of support among a strong majority of russian society for genocidal imperialism.

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Russian society’s genuine love for genocidal imperialism has nothing to do with propaganda (if that’s what you were referring to).

        Mind you, they are fully capable of change, they just don’t want to and have no incentive to do (Westerners enabling and promoting their victim-hood narratives only contributes to this).

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Russian society’s genuine love for genocidal imperialism has nothing to do with propaganda (if that’s what you were referring to).

          Oh, I’d venture that propaganda is one big contributor to that sentiment, even if the sentiment has been present for a very long time (certainly since WW2). Old horseshit is still horseshit.

          Look at American exceptionalism as another example of long-standing unfounded belief that’s exploited by many factions of that country’s ruling elite.

          • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            As I said, I don’t buy the propaganda excuse. Independent information sources (in russian) have always been easily available and accessible by all (literally in under 10 seconds). Just look at the creation dates of the DW Russian or BBC Russian YT channels (or even their own TV Dozdh). By mid 2010s YT was widely available not only on desktop, but even on smartphones. Not to mention russians full well know what the KGB is like and how dishonest they are.

            Let me give you an illustrative example.

            You have Vladimir Kara-murza, darling of the west, went to jail for public opposition to the full scale invasion, western educated and with UK citizenship. And yet here is a recent statement from Kara-Murza:

            There is another reason why the Russian Defense Ministry recruits so many members of ethnic minorities [to fight in the war against Ukraine]: as it turns out, because it is psychologically really difficult for [ethnic] Russians to kill Ukrainians. Because we are one people. We are very close peoples, as everybody knows. We have nearly the same language, the same religion, and centuries of history in common. But if it’s someone from another culture, allegedly it’s easier [for them to kill Ukrainians]. I hadn’t really thought about it before. I thought the reasons were primarily economic. But after what [a colleague who spoke about the Buryats] said, I started thinking about it too.

            He said this in a speech to the French senate, no less!

            We are not on people and I want nothing to with any of them, be it putin or Vladimir Kara-Murza.

            And yet WaPo decided to give him the opportunity to write another bullshit article about russian victimhood and innocence.

            Putin’s anxiety is understandable. The Kremlin knows that public opposition to the Ukraine war is much greater than what its propaganda would admit.

            Is Vladimir Kara-Murza under the influence of propaganda while living in the west?

            Agreed regarding the negative elements of American exceptionalism. But people in the US have a spectrum of views and the US has had a measure of dynamism in terms of social attitudes. The same cannot be said about the overwhelming majority of russians.

  • manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Germans say Russia plans to invade any day, likely tomorrow.

    uh huh, Germany to annex poland when?

    lots of fucking cretins in this thread smdh

    • thecaptaintrout@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ready to fuck around. Not ready to find out.

      Threatening and posturing to destabilize Europe and NATO, while going heavily on grey zone warfare and divisive misinformation campaigns. At the top, should not want any kinetic warfare against NATO, but rhetoric, ‘yes’ men, and arrogance may make some think they can and should.

      • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s Putin, always claiming he’s got a royal flush even when just holding a pair to try to intimidate the opponent into folding. It’s the same every time.

        • thecaptaintrout@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Saddest part is his grand strategy is literally open source, i.e. “Foundations of Geopolitics”, written by a Russian ultra nationalist, taught in Russian military academy’s. Main points are weakening NATO and US by supporting internal strife and divisions, allowing Russia to take back its “land” and sphere of influence.

          Top many willing useful idiots for them to use. . .

          • Mangoguana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            I read that book, boy it’s a steaming crock of shit. They are following the worst book second to mein kampf that has soo many misconceptions that you really get a sense on why Russia is such a shithole.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            So: divide and rule, and do as much imperialism as they can get away with.

            Guy must be some kinda fuckin’ genius.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Also and as somebody else pointed out, if makes sense for him to try and scare European nations so that they refrain from sending as many weapons and ammo to Ukraine because of thinking they might need those to defend themselves from Russia.

        So a sabble-rattling discourse and even the recent air-space intrusions by Russian military planes are cheap ways of trying to get the strategical gain of Ukraine receiving fewer weapons from the rest of Europe and even if those things fail he loses nothing from doing them (at this point, he’s hardly going to get in a worst situation than he already put himself in).

        It makes absolute sense to pursue a strategy where at best you gain something and at worst you lose nothing.

        Now, if the response to the Russian intrusion in European airspace had been for European nations to set up and enforce a no fly for Russia inside Ukraine, that would’ve definitelly been a loss for him (at the very least the rest of Europe would protect Western Ukraine from Russian drones and air assets, freeing Ukranian assets to be used elsewhere), but the leaderships of European nations have yet to show a willingness or capability to act decisivelly like that as a group: even the help with weapons and ammo took ages to get going properly, was riddled with “red lines” (like “no tanks”, then “no jets”, then “no long range cruise missiles” and who could forget the whole “can’t be used against Russian territory” artificial limitation) and there was a lot of feet-dragging, especially from Germany) so actual direct intervention even if only with air assets doesn’t seem likely as response to “mere” Russian air space intrusions and unconventional warfare that can be denied (cyber attacks, election interference, support for extreme political forces, cutting of undersea cables and so on).

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Yeah, but that’s kind of what they’re already doing, in which case it’s not news. He’s implying they have some nebulous new kind of readiness.

        Maybe they do, maybe he’s just trying to get everyone on board with rearming. Which I guess is a good idea in any case.