Yes, I know, trolls etc. But such action turns any conversation into a bad joke. And anybody who trusts a moderator is a fool.

Find a better way.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    the thing youre missing about the fediverse… if a community does not approve of a mod they can literally pick up and move their community to a new community or even a different instance altogether.

    this has happened at least a few times.

    moderation is a necessary management tool, and yes, it is certainly abused… but the fediverse gives us the ability to tell mods to go fuck themselves.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The fact that unmoderated places attract pedophiles sharing pictures, Spambots, and trolls.
        Go take a look at a random board on 8kun if you don’t believe me.
        It’s largely unmoderated, you’ll love it!!!

        • rainrain@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          There are other ways to control the conversation. Ones that do not require a moderator. For example, voting.

          So not necessary.

          • superkret@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m sure the police will agree when they find child abuse videos on the instance server’s HDD.

            “No don’t arrest me, the child porn was DOWNVOTED!!”

            • rainrain@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              4 months ago

              Imagine a form of downvoting that led to removal from the server.

              Decree of the masses vs decree of authority . Still gets the job done.

              • InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                4 months ago

                You do mean like this very comment, right now?

                IDK… Careful what you wish for?
                The irony of saying this, while also benefiting from humans’ leeway is kinda rich, just saying.

  • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    “We don’t need moderators!” shouts the Troll*, in the wrong community.

    * either a troll or just an idiot, doesn’t matter imo

      • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean… “To fear”? No. But There are plenty legitimate to remove comments and posts that have nothing, and I mean absolutely nothing, to do with mod overreach or censorship.

        • removing derailing threads from heated discussions
        • removing the annoying “just asking questions” people from LGBTQ+ safe spaces
        • removing posts accidentally posted into the wrong community
        • removing troll posts
        • banning repeat troublemakers not willing to follow the rules
        • removing aggressive, sexist, racist,… posts

        On the other hand, anti-moderation people only ever seem to come up with “but I want to be able to post whatever I want!”

        “Free speech” in this context means: you can go create your own instance or community, with blackjack and hookers! And mods can use the tools at their disposal to enable the rest of us to not have to deal with bullshit.

  • SolidShake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    A mod MAKES the community and makes the rules of that community.

    Kinda like how you wouldn’t want me to go to your and take a shit on the carpet.

    • rainrain@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What would be better is a system where the sanctity of the conversation was respected. Where there was 100% assurance that everything you said got to me and everything I said got to you. No question at all. No man in the middle censoring and altering according to his whim.

    • vatlark@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m a mod here. While it’s not one of my favorites, it does follow the format pretty well. I try to use Rule 1 sparingly.

      It’s a bad look to shutdown critics. I think the votes and comments are doing a good job of bringing perspective to OP’s opinion.

      • anakin78z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Thanks for your reply. My post was meant as kind of a joke, but it’s good to know the mods actually read through things.

    • rainrain@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s weird. The simple fact of being watched and told what you can say. And the possibility that what you’re saying is being edited and what you’re hearing is edited too.

      This strikes me as abhorrent. But most of the people here call it necessary, preferable and even desirable.

      • vatlark@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I moderate showerthoughts.

        I certainly don’t know everything but I’m very sure I can’t edit other people’s posts.

        If a post is questionable, then I try to message people and talk it out. We are all human.

        Some people wish we moderated more aggressively to keep the post quality higher, others, like yourself wish there was less moderation. I try to leave things up unless there is an obvious violation, I try to apply the rules fairly, I am human.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    its the same function in all forums that have mods. the problem is some doing it based on personal bias which is the wrong, and reddit allows too much leeway in what mods will ban or remove.