![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
What always gets me about this, is that they want to hurt people. That’s not even disputed.
Like, can we just acknowledge how shitty of a person you have to be to start from that position in life?
What always gets me about this, is that they want to hurt people. That’s not even disputed.
Like, can we just acknowledge how shitty of a person you have to be to start from that position in life?
It’s the same picture.jpg
AND IT WILL KEEP HAPPENING UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES. - musk
trump and the republican party did this. It’s a feature, not a bug. This is what they want.
Technically he died of pneumonia but he did have Alzheimers. It was on full display for years. But you rarely die of it. It just makes you much more likely to die from something else.
Not all of the kids have to be theirs either.
Yeah, just ran into the same issue trying to order one.
No, because he’s rich and influencial and keeps saying and doing shit that gets him front page in the news. That’s the way the world works unfortunately.
You should stop being friends and family with them. Trust me, you will live your best life if you do.
Language is always evolving, never static. A dictionary and the definitions are backwards looking always. Dictionaries are always trying to keep up with the evolutions of language, but they’ll always lag behind.
Just keep in mind that words change how they’re used over our lifetimes, and it never stops.
E. G. Irregardless is now a valid word, when 15 and 20 years ago it was people mixing up regardless or irrespective so now I don’t even get that high horse anymore 😉
Correct. This is how it’s always been.
I’m going to need sources here.
The republican led highly partisan SCOTUS struck this down along party lines.
So you’re really going to have to explain to me how this is somehow the democrats fault for trying here.
The fuck is up with these comments? Jesus christ.
You raise some fair criticisms of my response and have given me some things to think about and consider.
And to update the American example then:
I’ll take a sixth helping of meatballs please.
You understand that prejudice has a specific malicious intent behind it, correct? That it’s prejudiced “with intent” for something nefarious that’s being hidden behind the veil of racist remarks.
Go ahead and tell us which one of those racist behaviors is on display here.
If Italian people were offended by this, or this limited their upward travel potential in the professional world, or was a way to hide derogatory behavior that people found undesirable by “dog whistling”, then it would qualify.
Unless you can point that out in this case, I think your sense of social justice is misplaced for what is just normal, tame, cultural fun poking.
Here, we’ll include Americans in the meme:
Amer-E-cans: The police were called to handle a domestic disturbance at a nearby home. There were no survivors.
Looking at the downvotes, it looks like everyone disagrees with you.
Italy walks the talk with its own stereotypes. And they take that quite seriously.
I think you underestimate the willingness of the sycophants in his administration to do his bidding.
Yup, nailed it