Is it? I know it goes further than this, but the idea of serving ads based off what users are subscribed to feels like one of the least awful ways this could be implemented. The same way your feed is generated, your pool of ads is drawn. It feels wrong to say this, but this doesn’t really bother me.
Instead we chuckle at a message of violence and wonder why people get radicalized.
The disconnect is you seem to think it’s a black and white thing. That one must love Hamas if they disapprove of recklessly bombing civilian encampments. Surely if these allegations were fake, Israel would be more than happy to disprove them? To not, I don’t know, protest violently for their right to horrifically mistreat Palestinians when reined in even slightly?
It is senseless to damn every living person in gaza for the actions of one group.
Also, it feels real questionable to talk so much about the Palestinian president without addressing Bibi - I highly recommend the behind the bastards episodes for anyone unsure what his deal is.
Why? The padding is there for those with the stomach for it, but you can just… play a new game once you’ve stopped having fun?
Cope and seethe troll
If my experience is anything to go by, you mug everybody you see, steal everything in their wallet to “identify them”, interrogate them while vomiting drunk in their apartment, and maybe solve a murder or two on accident.
Ah yes I am 100% positive “Fisherman75” is not baiting whatsoever
I would like to preface my comment with the statement that this is a sad subject and a very unfortunate situation.
But has anyone considered the possibility that the cats of Istanbul may have seized control of the government?
I’m not sure gunpowder is the thing you wanna try and argue is a western invention
I don’t see why Trump would really need to be in on it. Plenty of people stand to gain from a trump presidency, and I’m not sure an “accidentally successful staged assassination” would be that much worse.
I would honestly say the odds it was a failed genuine assassination attempt are slim to none. Doesn’t this feel far too convenient? We obviously know nothing now, but I feel like it’s gotta be the knee jerk assumption.
Sorry that the developers don’t cater to making life easier for people that haven’t bought their game lmao what an entitled take
I think by shitty they mean ineffective, not poor manners.
“I cannot reasonably purchase anything not connected to China, this is an issue”
“Wow guys, he just admitted to buying things from China! What a hypocrite!”
C’mon.
It’s not that they can’t still be profit driven, it’s that they can’t be sued by investors for not being ruthlessly profit driven. Private just means that they have the choice at all
Would you like some extra mongering with your fear today?
Ah yes, how greedy of a company, to checks notes stop you from telling their online distribution service that you own something you don’t.
Pirate all you want, live how you want. But valve is a company, they do sorta have to follow those pesky laws and regulations.
It’s saying that and it’s saying they have no concept of the dangers of wildlife. But everyone takes addressing the latter as ignoring the former, when they’re two separate conversations only combined by the dumb analogy.
Polar bears will in fact just kill you and eat you. Grizzlies, very likely to be territorial. Black bears are the most “cowardly”, but all three will fuck you up to protect their young, hence why the season matters.
I haven’t exactly done the math on relative bear populations to tell you if your odds are better with a random bear or a random man, but it doesn’t matter, you wouldn’t consider any of my statements valid even if I wrote a whole ass thesis.
Those who just live by a philosophy might browse there for recipe ideas and that’s about it.