• merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sometimes, sometimes it isn’t. Specifically what would you have charged him with, and what evidence would have convicted him?

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, it is. Merely starting a war isn’t justification for prosecution in the ICC. That’s not how the laws work.

      • dudinax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s laws written, courts. They’ve arrested people, tried them, and punished the convicted. You can call it whatever dumb word you want to call it.