Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court’s July ruling in Trump v United States granted Donald Trump immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken in his official capacity changes fundamentally the dynamics of the Oval Office. This decision shields a sitting president from legal accountability for official acts, enabling unlawful behavior without consequence.

Critics, including Michael Waldman of the Brennan Center for Justice, argue that this ruling provides a “how-to guide” for presidential lawbreaking.

The Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority, solidified by Trump’s three appointees, has previously overturned Roe v. Wade, and now, with this immunity ruling, further consolidates presidential power. If Trump is re-elected, this immunity could embolden him to pursue aggressive policies without fear of legal repercussions, raising concerns about unchecked executive authority and the erosion of democratic checks and balances.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Have you seen SCOTUS? Has. And wholly enabled by the GOP, when McConnell was Speaker.

    Fuck all of them.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 days ago

      Actively blocking appointments from one party then packing it full of another party. The blame doesn’t lie solely with Trump. All of these headlines are disingenuous for so many reasons it makes me nauseous.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        scotus should be 5-4 the other way, if not for that fuckface hypocrite moscow mitch.