Can we make any food without relying on plants?

  • Technically, we can.

    Practically, it has taken a couple of billion years of evolution for plants to figure all of this out. We can spend a lot of effort replicating that process, or we can just use plants. One of those options is a lot cheaper than the other!

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 days ago

    Because photovoltaic panels are more expensive than plant leaves

    We could do what you’re suggesting, it would just be incredibly inefficient.

  • GiveOver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    I assume you’re talking about (for example) some equipment that takes in soil/water/air, rearranges the atoms and churns out potatoes. We definitely can’t do that. It’s too hard, we’re nowhere near that level of technology.

    I can only imagine the people in this thread are referring to lab grown stuff where they use plant cells, which is cheating because that’s still depending on plants.

  • aasatru@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    As other people say, it’s easier to let the plants do the job for us.

    That said, check out vertical farming if you’re not familiar with it. It’s a modern approach to farming that very much relies on plants, but dramatically reduces problems such as excessive land use and dependence on pesticides.

  • Kalkaline @leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    You have to figure out how to recreate photosynthesis which, believe it or not, is an incredibly difficult process to recreate.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Recreating photosynthesis is the easiest part by a huge margin.

      Whether you decide to define it as synthesizing ATP or glucose, both a simple molecules that we can create in a lab. Everything else is the hard part, there is a huge amount of “things” on that “everything”.