• ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    No one is going to believe your arguments over the dissenting judges.

    It is also very telling you’ve responded to no comments mentioning what the dissenting judges have said.

    • Akuden@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The dissent is in bad faith and should be discarded. The president enjoys no authority to assassinate anyone and therefore enjoys no immunity for doing so. The dissent is not serious and should be treated as such.

      • Victoria Antoinette @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The president enjoys no authority to assassinate anyone

        obama thanks you for not remembering that time he assassinated a 16 year old american citizen.

      • ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The dissent is in bad faith and should be discarded.

        Based upon what?

        The bar for internet rando invalidating legal expert is pretty high BTW.

        • Akuden@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Based on the incredible hyperbole written in the dissent. Legal expert turned partisan hack quite quickly when they start talking about assassinations.

          • blazera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Are you still at this shit? Im still waiting on you to provide where in the ruling it specifically addresses not allowing assassinations like you claimed