![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
You’re welcome, glad you could put more words in my mouth.
Right!
Except the kid is across the world, and we don’t know them very well. Last we heard, they were one of the worst children in the world. Instead of asking the neighbors to pool money to build a boat to go save this kid, you go to all your neighbors and steal that money.
Fuckin’ a logic.
Not wanting to fund a war doesn’t mean they hate Ukraine or it’s citizens.
The US has agreements to defend their allies. Ukraine isn’t an ally.
Source?
You bring up an excellent point. America doesn’t have to provide further support, because they aren’t single handedly funding Ukraine.
https://www.ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-against-ukraine/ukraine-support-tracker/
Not everyone who disagrees with war or your position on it is deep throating Putin.
You have no idea what Putin’s goal is so don’t pretend as if you have some deep insight. The EU can fund its own wars.
The EU can fund its own wars?
Ukraine should fight back. Americans shouldn’t fund war. See how easy this is?
Sound about right. No need to fund this slaughter.
Just win after win after win.
Straight to finger pointing, classic. Yes, let’s figure out what political party the mentally ill child belonged too so we can blame it on that sides politics. Lol
Removed by mod
What merit is a person’s political affiliations if they’re mentally ill?
United States of America v. Ramiz Zijad Hodzic et al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division, No.4:15CR49CDP/DDN, 9 May 2018
Lawful combatants enjoy “combatant immunity” for acts of warfare, including the wounding or killing of other human beings, “provided those actions were performed in the context of ongoing hostilities against lawful military targets, and were not in violation of the law of war.”
Let’s follow that logic.
You locate a terrorist. You just so happen to have a couple guys who can bomb that terrorist. You murder the terrorist. You are charged with murder because the laws of this nation do not allow murder.
Same scenario, but now it’s the president. Please tell me what the difference is. Why can the president not be charged with a crime but you can? What would you call that?
You disagree with 74 million people then?
I’m not Republican.