In a scathing filing, the special counsel pushed back on Judge Aileen Cannonās interpretations of laws that could define the case against Trump
Special CounselĀ Jack SmithĀ went toe-to-toe with U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon over her requests for jury instructions inĀ Donald TrumpāsĀ classified documents case.
In aĀ scathing filingĀ submitted Tuesday, Smith accused Cannon of operating on an āunstated and fundamentally flawed legal premiseā when she requested that the parties in the case draft different versions of their proposed jury instructions based on their competing interpretations of laws governing classified materials and presidential records.
Trump has argued that his retention of classified documents after his ouster from the White House was perfectly legal. Claiming that he both unilaterallyĀ telepathically declassifiedĀ the documents, and that they were simply personal records he was already authorized to take. The former presidentās trial on 40 charges related to his alleged mishandling of the documents is scheduled to begin in May, but willĀ likely be delayed.
i donāt want to hear about Jackās feelings, i want to hear about his results
Nah, this is good to hear about - I donāt really care about his feelings either but Cannon is a corrupt and incompetent judge.
Corrupt, yes, but Iām not so sure about incompetent. If she were incompetent then there would be tricks to help Trump that she missed, but as far as I know sheās executed every opportunity for corruption perfectly.
Do you have evidence that sheās anything less than a goddamned veritable virtuoso of corrupt traitorousness?
The article is editorializing through that headline and it is based on the magazineās or the authorās interpretation of the filing. No way that Jack Smith has expressed emotions publicly on this matter.