So after a run in with a moderator yesterday Iā€™ve had some thoughts I felt I wanted to share.

I wonā€™t name them here, you are welcome to look at my comment history and make up your own mind.

In this instance a user posted some misinformation. I donā€™t think they intended to, they merely perpetuated a myth, they clearly simply knew no better.

I tried to respond diplomatically, they doubled down, other users piled on, the downvotes are plenty and then I responded with an article citing evidence supporting my assertions.

I also stated that the burden of proof lies with the claimant and asked for some context on why they seemed dead set on the lie they were aping back, asking if they subscribe to other myth based beliefs, religions, etc. That post was unceremoniously deleted with no notice to me and no reasons givenā€¦ until the user pointed out in another post that they are the sole mod of the community and warned me that they were ā€œnot afraid to banā€ me should I ā€œcross the lineā€ in a very *ā€˜Iā€™m the sheriff of this here townā€™ *tone. Which gave me a chuckle.

Thatā€™s my side of the story, itā€™s all there if you want to draw your own conclusions. It really doesnā€™t matter who is right or wrong in a ā€˜someone is wrong on the internetā€™ spat but I did spot a chink in the fediverse through this incident.

The real point here is that this kind of behaviour is one of things that made Reddit fucking awful and Iā€™d hate to see it flourish here in the fediverse.

I donā€™t have the solutions just some suggestions that Iā€™d be keen to hear others opinions on:

  1. No moderation without representation. IOW: mods should be democratically elected.
  2. Mod elections should be annual and no mod should enjoy that status for life.
  3. There should be a mechanism for inducing a ā€˜no confidenceā€™ mode election at any time otherwise the communities are likely to splinter into ā€œreal_ā€ communities just as they did on Reddit which no community in the fediverse can currently afford.

What say you my brothers and sisters and everything in between? Is there a way to safeguard against cronyism, corruption and other frailties of the human ego?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    10 months ago

    Yeah, OP was going off on a wild tangent about LSD in a sub about shit talking Teslasā€¦

    And the mod explicitly said ā€œthis has nothing to do with this subā€ and OP kept insulting the mod and asked to be banned.

    The mod finally deleted a single comment from OP, and OP is really really upset about it.

    I honestly donā€™t know why the mod didnā€™t just ban OP, he was literally asking for it

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      That is my takeaway too. Think Iā€™ll just block OP preemptively because this kind of self important drama is ludicrous.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      Moderation is sometimes about finding the smallest touch that keeps the conversation going forward. People have bad days, etc.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        10 months ago

        And a day or two ban to cool off fixes that, and communicates that the behavior is unacceptable.

        Clearly OP didnā€™t learn any lessons if a day later theyā€™re making this post.

    • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      These are not the facts. The facts are still there for all to see. Why lie?

      My post of the topic of LSD was a response to the OP not a wild tangent. They brought it up.