“We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.”

That’s gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I’ve heard in a while.

  • PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Trump could back literal death camps in the West Bank and they’ll say, “Well, at least I didn’t vote for the lesser evil!”

    • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Since you guys are so brain-broken by the status quo of American politics, let me break down the goal of these people.

      1. Threaten to not vote for party because they are doing bad thing

      2. Party sees significant numbers of people threatening not to vote for them.

      3. Party changes it’s policies.

      4. People vote for party.

      It’s like you’re completely incapable not thinking in black-and-white, and don’t understand it’s actually possible to leverage politicians. No one wants Trump, and if he wins no one is to blame but the Democrats.