• cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Note that this means “83% of people killed were civilians”, not that 83% of civilians were killed. As the graph in the article illustrates, that puts this neck and neck with other recent genocides:

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      that puts this neck and neck with other recent genocides

      The fact that this sentence can be said, unironically, and backed with data, is kinda depressing.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Notably, Hamas on Oct 7 killed two civilians for every military casualty. By the IDF’s own numbers, the IDF are literally greater terrorists than Hamas. Hamas literally does a better job at avoiding civilian casualties than the IDF does.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        If you qualify military targets the way the IDF does then Hamas killed over 90% military targets on october 7.

        • wheezy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          And we’ll likely never know how many civilians/soldiers were killed by Israel issuing the Hannibal Directive on October 7th. Something we do know they issued that day.

          Yes. Israel has a protocol that says “killing/harming our own people is preferred to them being kidnapped”.