If only Democrats had the stones to do this.

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    9 days ago

    The fight for $15 movement started 13 years ago. $15 in 2012 money is equal to over $20 in 2025 money. It’s taking the most progressive senator we’ve got to even suggest a pittance that is below what we’ve been asking for for over a decade.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      And it is $17 in 2030.

      Here from Europe, let me recommend one thing we do well: we link our equivalent of social security to the average wage growth, not to inflation.

      This ensures that all voters benefit from wage growth. And thus all voters demand the same thing from the politicians.

      • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        The problem with that happening in the US is there has been no wage growth, only retraction. Between inflation and wage inequality our purchasing power is nearly half what it was 25 years ago.

        • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          That’s the point. Your problem is that a lot of voters aren’t affected by wage growth. So politicians don’t feel the pressure to enact wage growth.

          All those senior people will actually vote for the guy who keeps wage growth in check.

        • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I know, but these things tend to be all or nothing.

          Either the American workers don’t seize power and they continue to get exploited, or they seize power and then a lot will be possible.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Median one bed apartment rent, across the entire US, is $1550 as of Feb 2025.

      Lets knock 20% of that off, to approximate a median studio apartment instead, give some leeway to poorer parts of the country.

      (there are not as good or reliable general stats counted for studio apartments, but a studio being 20% less than a one bed is… hopefully a reasonable, napkin math aporoximation)

      Ok, that’s $1240.

      Alright, now we use the ‘rent should be 30% of your income’ rule.

      Thats $4135 a month, rounded up very slightly to the nearest 5.

      Ok, 40 hours a week, roughly 4 weeks a month = 160 hours.

      4135 / 160 = $25.85, again rounded up to the closet 5 cents for simplicity, so thats your actual minimum ‘living wage’.

      If you wanna say a studio should be 30% off a one bedroom?

      Math works out to roughly $22.60

      If you wanna say an actual one bedroom should be the standard, works out to about $32.60

      Any way you look at this, $17 an hour is too low, that’s still… you can’t even afford a studio (as in, you cannot pass the rent to income threshold without a cosigner or double deposit or somethingnon your lease) you need roommates, you’re still living with your parents.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    NO!! Not a number! Tie it to inflation, as a proportion!! Picking a specific number is what got us in this mess in the first place

    • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      9 days ago

      If you look at the timeline in the article, post-2030 the act states that it would be indexed.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          8 days ago

          He’s going to tell us to vote for another Neoliberal after drumming up all this support.

          Watch.

          • ebolapie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            And if he does? Preferring a neoliberal to a fascist does not make one a neoliberal, especially if a neoliberal has a better shot at preventing a fascist from gaining office than a leftist. Bernie is a social democrat and a pragmatist, and if that’s not left enough for you than say that, but don’t get your ideologies confused.

            • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.worldBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Everyone has already forgotten what happened when the DNC used Bernie to try to bait and switch his voters for Hilary. We might be cooked if everyone has already forgotten this strategy doesn’t work.

              The DNC Neoliberals also funded fringe right wing campaigns to give themselves easy competition, and instead lost to them. Making them partially responsible for Trump ever gaining power, they paved the road every step of the way through fucking insane excuses that limp fuck neolibs just keep lapping up like dogs.

              I personally can’t ever vote for another Republican or Democrat again, MAYBE if an actual leftist is the democratic canidate. But IMO the only way to free ourselves is to end the Duopoly forever, there’s no baby in that bathwater.

              • ebolapie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                without looking it up what is neoliberalism and how is it different from social democracy or, indeed, liberalism?

                • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Neoliberals are people pretending to be leftists that suck rich cock instead of representing the majority of their electorate.

          • zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            And that neo-liberal will be the only option that has a snowball’s chance to beat Republicans.

            Sanders isn’t so starry-eyed as to undermine better in the pursuit of perfect.

            He’s been doing this a LOT longer than you.

              • zenpocalypse@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 days ago

                We may be, but he’s still doing the smart thing instead of pushing for the impossible while allowing the terrible, because you don’t like the better.

                • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  pushing for the impossible

                  You mean the bare minimum functions of a democratic society, yeah that’s pretry easy and most of europe already figured this out.

                  while allowing the terrible.

                  You are a dumb person for being fooled into accepting this.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Correct. Before people say “it should be $25/hr,” federal minimum wage is only matched by the poorest of states. State minimum wage increases would be warranted and implemented in states with a higher cost of living following the federal wage hike.

      • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        “But muh McDonald’s prices!”

        They’re already $10 a meal my dude, and Amazon is Amazon no matter where you live

          • JollyBrancher @lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            I moved from upstate NY to eastern PA in 2020. The average fast food worker was making 50% more in upstate NY. Most prices were the same, if not within 10 cents at worst.

      • warbond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Then we make two wages, one we call minimum, the other we call living. That way it’s easy to know if a place is offering a living wage or if it’s just unimportant work.

        • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          The only problem with that is there’s so much work people consider unimportant that is absolutely vital, just not what people want to do.

          Like fast food workers during school hours

          • warbond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I agree with you, the “unimportant” part was tongue in cheek. My point really is that if a person wants a job done for money, they need to either pay a living wage or admit that the work isn’t important enough to pay for. There shouldn’t be an in-between for people to take advantage of.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Then we make two wages, one we call minimum, the other we call living.

          That way we can tell the difference between the morlocks and the eloi.

        • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          lol right now we do have two wages. The minimum wage… and the subminimum wage. Yes, that is a real thing! 2.13$ an hour if you make more than 30$ in tips a month.

  • dick_fineman@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    By 2030, $17 will be the equivalent of $5/hr. Can we just skip the bullshit and tie minimum wage to 2xSGA@40hr/wk? Right now that’d be about $18.70

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 days ago

    They need to stop using fixed values and switch to a calculation based on GDP, cost of living, inflation, and other such factors. If you do that you don’t need to keep fighting to increase it.

  • the_q@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 days ago

    Sweet. $17/hr * 40 = $680 a week * 4 = $2720 a month * 52 = $32640 all before tax. Still not enough to live on.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, the “$15 an hour” debate has been going on for so long that the number has realistically increased to ~$23 per hour. And if a $23/hr minimum wage makes you balk, maybe you should consider how little you’re being paid for the job you currently do.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      What Bernie 17 by 2030? Is fucking for real? Needs 25 an hour NOW! Might well tell people to keep straving. I should kmow make 24 an hour wife makes 16 and we still live paycheck to paycheck. With no car payments just house. Shit so fucking expensive. And its only going get worse. Why not 17 an hour now and 25 by 2030?

      • PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        50/hr or gtfo

        If it sounds crazy it’s because you’re been conditioned to believe that some jobs aren’t worth a living wage.

        It’s crazy.

        That means capitalism believes that people who work those jobs don’t deserve to live.

        It’s a class war and they are killing us.

        • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 days ago

          No my fucking problem is we started this fight in 2012 for $15 an hour. Now what 2025 and its 17 by 2030? Its fucking joke and sad that it won’t even pass. We need to be shutting this country down until our demands are met. This bill lile all the others won’t even pass the Senate.

    • alkbch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      If you really believe the USD is valueless, give me all your USD.

  • Knowing that my state has the highest minimum wage in the country, and it still isn’t enough to live off of in this state, I think that the minimum needs to be almost twice that. At least in California. Or the federal minimum needs to be based on what shit actually costs regionally, and not just a single number for all 50 states.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      No single wage is going to be adequate to cover a country as large and as diverse as the United States. The federal minimum wage is not meant to be a solution for every state, but more like a way to set an absolute bare minimum. States, and even cities, can set minimum wages higher than the federal one.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        If your state’s minimum wage isn’t 7.25/hr with 2.13/hr tipped, don’t act like others should settle for less when you don’t have to.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Or the federal minimum needs to be based on what shit actually costs regionally, and not just a single number for all 50 states.

      “Got mine, fuck you.”

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            You don’t get it. I’ve never made six figures in my life. That’s NY poor. We pay more to live here. A dozen eggs is $12.99 here right now. A studio apartment is $1800/mo. Things cost more in wealthier states, so the poverty line is higher, hence the higher state minimum wage.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              And therefore an hour of my life is worth less than an hour of yours.

              Permanent underclass of flyover morlocks.

              • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                Still not getting it. Money is fictional. How many cartons of eggs per hour do you make? How many days do you need to work to pay rent? God you’re a dense one.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Let’s put this in a way you’ll refuse to understand because it contradicts the semester of econ you had with someone who was obviously a chicago school weenie.

                  Workers deserve a minimum level of protection no matter where they work. And I don’t trust anyone who sees a statement like that and starts carving out exceptions before anything is accomplished.

  • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    They only mention livable wages when they are not in a position to do anything about it.

    We need $25 now, not $17 in 5 years. Bernie has become a fucking joke and a shadow of who he used to be

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Or how about just no wages? Kick out the capitalists stealing the profits and divide that amongst the workers.

      Abolish the wage system.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      They only mention livable wages when they are not in a position to do anything about it.

      In fairness, this was just as unlikely to pass under democrats.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Amazing how every time they’re powerless they wanna raise the minimum wage (to what we asked in 2012), legalize weed, codify Roe v. Wade, and this time stop Trump.

      If they get a hold of Congress who much do you think they’ll go for it? Assuming we have elections again.