For more than 30 years, the United States has worked tirelessly to eliminate our chemical weapons stockpile. Today, I am proud to announce that the United States has safely destroyed the final munition in that stockpileā€”bringing us one step closer to a world free from the horrors of chemical weapons.Ā Successive administrations have determined that theseā€¦

  • OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Why do I feel like some has gotten lost over the years and weā€™re just gonna ā€œfindā€ it if we ever get into another world war? Or we got rid of the weapons, but it was juuuust long enough to make sure we stored the info on how to make them?

    Donā€™t get me wrong, Iā€™m super happy if we did get rid of them, Iā€™m just skeptical.

    • MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      US did not use chemical weapons since WW I. Why would we start using them in future wars?

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        What are you talking about?!

        Agent Orange, White Phosphorous, crowd control conpounds (like tear gas, ā€œpepperā€ munitions, etc). Napalm was used in Iraq and Kuwait.

        What youā€™re talking about is the US not using a very specific list of very specific weapons that are effective due to their chemical properties and the way those chemicals interact with human bodies. It is by no means a comprehensive list of munitions with similar chemical properties.

        And it is a classic imperialist move to make a list of some chemical weapons, call the list The List Of Chemical Weapons and they develop new chemical weapons that arenā€™t on the list and say ā€œThese arenā€™t chemical weapons because they arenā€™t on the listā€.