If they follow their deployment, then they have the opportunity to refuse unlawful orders. Or even just do a shit job at following them “Sorry sarg, couldn’t find any brown people today. Looked everywhere.”
Refusing to go at all just ensures that people who don’t object to the orders are the ones who go.
How playable is it on the Deck?
Ah, you’re right.
You don’t get to choose where you go when you’re a member of the military.
This is old news.
Not to mention that not all hemorrhoids are external.
OP, what do you think a hemorrhoid is?
How else am I going to control the music that’s playing on the vent fan speaker?
I bring my phone into the shower, but it’s for music control.
It’s also pretty standard shit for an apartment lease.
How? It’s pretty standard for most of that stuff to be included in a lease agreement.
Like, management is definitely an ass for how they communicated the information, but if the rules are in the lease and don’t violate your local tenant laws, then you have to follow them.
I wouldn’t say the NG members are evil people doing evil things. They don’t exactly get a choice in the matter about where they’re deployed, and I haven’t seen any reports of NG members doing anything nefarious.
The best part is I now have a gnarly scar right under him that looks like a path of burnination. Unrelated, burnination is a real word.
Again, a “best of” list of 20 some odd movies spanning many years based on the author’s opinion doesn’t support the doubt they were expressing because it doesn’t provide enough information.
You need to learn what an argument is.
Saying you doubt a claim and providing evidence for your doubts is an argument against the validity of the claim.
My saying that the evidence you provided doesn’t support your doubt is a valid criticism and doesn’t mean I support the claim you’re doubting.
I answered that in the comment you quoted.
You need to learn that criticizing the validity someone’s argument isn’t support for the other side.
And my point was that their links didn’t support their doubt.
Pointing out someone’s argument is flawed doesn’t mean you support the other side of the argument.
Please provide a quote of me making a statement regarding the validity of either side of the claim.
I did no such thing. That’s you extrapolating incorrectly.
Literally all I said was that the provided information isn’t relevant to the discussion.
Raw cunt would be my guess