• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • I didnā€™t mean to say they have insightful thoughts, but instead that theyā€™re smart in the way they position themselves publicly and politically. AndrĆ© Ventura in Portugal is a good example. He has a doctorate in Law, is clearly a smart individual despite often playing a part of almost ā€œanti-intellectualismā€. He could easily fit in the description of your typical academic intellectual while somehow managing to gather the support of those who hate academic intellectuals.

    He grew politically within the main center right party - a fact which he uses to claim that heā€™s not actually far right - and eventually jumped out of it and created his own party, arguing that his old party was part of the ā€œestablishmentā€ - which he claims to be against. In truth, he left his old party because he had reached his political ceiling - his more extreme views meant he wasnā€™t realistically ever going to attain the kind of influence he wanted within a center right party.

    Now, he offers no insightful thoughts of course. He often contradicts himself, changes positions wildly depending on the crowd or on the weather, offers no viable solutions to any of the problems he points out. But heā€™s very good at jumping on any mistake made by the bigger parties and capitalizing on those. He often points out the mistakes that everyone can recognize, exaggerates smaller issues to paint the parties in power as incompetent and then follows up with the dumbest solutions you can think of. But thatā€™s the thing - since he isnā€™t in power, his solutions donā€™t actually have to resist the test of being implemented, they just have to exist. He can act like he has the solution to everything.

    Publicly, he often toes the line of whatā€™s ā€œacceptableā€ speech, so he can both appeal to his more extreme supporters but simultaneously paint the idea that heā€™s actually a reasonable guy whoā€™s unfairly vilified by the media and ā€œthe leftā€. In truth, like Trump, he grew up in part precisely because of how much the media insisted on attacking him - while giving him exactly the attention he wanted. As a somewhat funny stat, the lowest rating his party has had amongst the public in the last few years was during the pandemic, when the media was so focused on talking about Covid that his party practically disappeared from the public eye for a few months. In the last election theyā€™ve got a really good result, so now theyā€™ve officially become a permanent problem. They now have to be treated like a ā€œnormalā€ party, whether people like it or not.

    Iā€™d argue Meloni is a good example in terms of political intelligence as well. She has been able to successfully paint herself as a sort of reasonable and pragmatic far right leader, unlike any of the previous Italian far right leaders, which is a big part of her success. She claims to be pro-EU and is openly anti-Russia - contrary to her predecessors - which might seem like minor positions but have actually been very important for her to paint herself as a sort of far right leader thatā€™s not that far right that she canā€™t work together with other European leaders. This is also important for many Italians since many see the EU favorably and a far right leader which is at least able to cooperate with the EU ensures that Italy can keep getting EU financing and can keep its influence within the Union. In practice, she represents the same ideas previous far right Italian leaders represented, but she tossed out many of their crazier positions in order to appear moderate by comparison.


  • Weirdest political take Iā€™ve ever had, but European far right leaders arenā€™t ā€œdollar store Trumpsā€. Unfortunately, theyā€™re often fairly smart individuals, with great academic records and very well regarded in their areas of expertise. Very unlike Trump. Which makes them all the more dangerous, because they donā€™t make the same mistakes that Trump somehow gets away with on the regular: no real life actions that go against their purported ideals (cheating or banging pornstars, for example), no blatant involvement in corruption or financial crimes either. Even in the way they speak, theyā€™re often vague enough in their (authoritarian) statements that they can still claim to hold democratic ideals and get away with it.

    I donā€™t think the UK is a great example of European politics, simply because UK politics is more akin to US politics than to any other European countryā€™s politics. Despite the UK technically being a multi party system, in practice it often acts like a two party system.

    Outside of the UK, thereā€™s many European countries - letā€™s say, as an example, Portugal, Spain and France - which have historically been governed by moderate parties, either on the center right or the center left (left and far left respectively on the American political compass), which have fundamentally failed to solve the respective countryā€™s problems.

    Portugal, for example, has been ruled by its Socialist Party for most of its democratic existence. Despite that, itā€™s currently dealing with chaos in its healthcare system. Thereā€™s a general lack of doctors, hours long emergency wait times, years long surgery waiting lines, all because of a fundamental failure in creating a good way of financing the healthcare system. Governments in Portugal, both socialist and center right ones, have until recently mostly agreed on the idea that healthcare should be free. But Portugal has never been very successful economically - which means supporting a free healthcare service has always been way more expensive than the country could financially handle. For a long time the problem of financing the healthcare system was simply postponed. But now itā€™s reached a point where many of its hospitals are in debt, itā€™s been unable to give any raises to any of its staff for years, these staff have been leaving in droves for the private sector, itā€™s been incapable of financing many medical acts, in many hospitals even basic maintenance has been indefinitely postponed, etc.

    While I still fundamentally agree with you that people are fools to trust the far right, I do understand why thereā€™s such a big distrust in traditional moderate parties, given how much theyā€™ve recently fucked up in dealing with many of the core issues in our countries - regardless of whether theyā€™re on the left or on the moderate right.


  • I have a personal pet peeve with that. The expression ā€œAs a Europeanā€ is almost always followed by something thatā€™s entirely false or only concerns the commenterā€™s specific country or region. For some reason, people assume that things that are often specific to their country are ā€œEuropeanā€.

    Just today I saw someone saying ā€œus Europeans have to take a first aid course before getting a driverā€™s licenseā€. WTF? I wish that was true. Itā€™s certainly not true for my country. Iā€™m not even sure thatā€™s true for more than half of European countries. From a quick google search it seems thatā€™s only a thing in maybe Germany, Austria, Hungary and Switzerland? Thereā€™s some twenty other European countries where that might not be a thing at all.

    Like I said, even internet Europeans have the weird habit of assuming things specific to their country are some shared European value, when itā€™s almost always not the case.


  • This part

    It beggars belief that the same people clowning on the US and UK would then turn around and say to themselves ā€œyes, but it will be different for us, it will work for us, our situation really is different, you donā€™t understandā€.

    and this one

    Before you click reply, just consider that you guys deserve to get fucking dunked on, because you guys spent decades laughing at other countries for doing this shit just to say ā€œhmmmā€¦ but what if sticking the fork in the electrical socket works out for me?ā€

    both imply the people laughing at other countries are the same group willing to ā€œstick the fork in the electrical socketā€. They arenā€™t.


  • This comment shows a large misunderstanding of european culture, policits, everything really. And I mean this with no offense, but thereā€™s no nice way to say it.

    The people who were - and still are - clowning on Americans for their politics are a different group than the people currently voting far right. Youā€™re not dunking on the people you think you are. Itā€™s tragically funny in a way because internet active and mostly left leaning circles still spend a lot of their time dunking on american politics while failing to see the growing trend of far right acceptance in Europe.

    Europeans also arenā€™t a singular entity. The comparison of the US vs Europe is almost always bad IMO, as much as people of the internet love to make it - both americans and europeans alike - because the differences between two neighboring european countries are often larger than those between the two most culturally different US states. The country next over is so radically different to mine in terms of politics, economic choices, language, culture, that the only thing making us both ā€œEuropeanā€ is a similar looking ID card and similar looking road signs. When I cross the border and order a coffee they look at me strange and then serve me what I would expect to get at an american coffee shop.

    Europe is facing some of the same problems of the US politically speaking. Summing it up to ā€œgetting one big wave of immigrationā€ is naive to say the least. Thereā€™s a growing discontent with traditional and more moderate parties, which have fundamentally failed to solve what many people see as big issues in their lives. Thereā€™s a housing crisis, an ever increasing wealth gap - which even left leaning socialist european parties, which were in power for decades in countries such as mine, have done next to nothing to prevent. Thereā€™s a perceived decrease in security - which is real in some places, while false in others but amplified by social media -, a bunch of high profile corruption cases all throughout Europe - often associated with high ranking members in more moderate parties. In short, thereā€™s an ever increasing number of real issues which traditional parties have fundamentally failed to solve. Some because theyā€™re genuinely complex issues, others because of sheer incompetence.

    The media in Europe has spent the last few years treating far right parties the same way the media in the US initially treated Trump - painting them and their followers as crazy people which should be ridiculed and often pushing aside whatever issue they pushed as their political flag. The problem is that far right parties in Europe often pick very real problems as their political flags - such as corruption in the case of my country. They offer no actual solutions to the problems, of course, but the attitude of the media helps them paint the idea that the media and traditional parties are aligned in protecting corrupt individuals and that the only way to tackle the problem is to vote for extreme parties. Whatever the ā€œmainā€ political flag is varies from country to country, but the logic is always the same: Problem exists -> problem is pushed aside by media and traditional parties for whatever reason -> far right party picks up problem as their political flag even though they offer no solutions -> people vote for far right party after years of seeing problem be apparently ignored.

    The last part on healthcare makes little sense as well. Public or partly public health services are culturally ingrained in a lot of European countries and many of the far right parties have been very outspoken about defending these services - not because they like their existence Iā€™m sure, but because these healthcare systems are too popular to openly attack. A common attribute in a lot of European far right parties is that though they often claim to despise ā€œthe leftā€ and make big claims about socialism having destroyed everything and etc, theyā€™ll quickly incorporate any left leaning measure they perceive as popular - often defending measures which are so far left that you wonā€™t even find them in the political plans of far left parties. Far right parties in Europe will incorporate anything they see as popular in their political plans - which they then use as a promotion point, arguing that they are ā€œaboveā€ the left and right divide, instead focusing on whatever is ā€œbetter for the countryā€.

    Add to all of this a fundamental failure in left wing and moderate right wing parties to address many of these issues, even while being in power for decades in the came of some European countries, and the constant attempts by these same parties to silence anyone who so much as mentions hot topics like immigration - often by labeling them as racists, fascists, etc and what you get is a growing distrust in these parties.


  • And itā€™s not like the output is saved for the next time; you need to do it every time.

    You can cache transcoded content in Jellyfin. So use a large enough cache and you basically only have to transcode once for every resolution. Itā€™s easier for me to set up transcoding than it would be to manually figure out which resolutions Iā€™ll prefer having around and transcoding them. Most of my stuff exists in 1080p, with 4k files for stuff I REALLY like, but I sometimes find myself watching on very low resolutions on my phone when away because I have pretty limited data.

    I find that in a few movies the 4K versions have a generally better image quality and are worth it even if you are sitting far away or not watching the content in 4K resolution at all. But like you, I only keep around 4k files for stuff I really like.

    EDIT: Iā€™ve also run into problems with codecs on other peopleā€™s devices when not transcoding. I could keep my files in whatever the most compatible codec is nowadays but having the ability to transcode on the spot is easier.




  • I get what you mean. My pet peeve is more with ā€œreal lifeā€ people. I donā€™t spend that much time on Lemmy anymore because, well, in a lot of ways itā€™s a lot like the worst parts of Reddit. And, in general, Iā€™ve started to notice that ā€œinternet opinionsā€ hardly ever represent what I see when I talk to real life people. So I tend to not care much about anything coming out of Lemmy, Reddit, Twitter, etc, as I find itā€™s often the loud very tiny minority.

    But I have the habit of reading opinion pieces on a couple of national newspapers, and Iā€™ve noticed the ā€œyouā€™re an anti-semite if you disagree with meā€ pattern a lot. Most opinion pieces by usually left leaning political writers have been more level headed than I actually expected them to be - in the sense that thereā€™s a couple of them who usually hold far more extreme positions on pretty much everything else and have been surprisingly ā€œcenterā€ on this issue. Whereas on the right, a few people who I would say are usually fairly moderate and level headed have gone hard on the ā€œthe left actually hates jews, they donā€™t care about civiliansā€ trope. And itā€™s very confusing to me because I have yet to find any actual left leaning person whoā€™s any relevant in my countryā€™s political scene actively sharing that discourse. So it all feels like baseless deflection. It was the kind of behavior I expected out of Reddit - itā€™s been the case for years I feel that in most bigger subreddits any critique of Israelā€™s government would immediately make you an honorary anti-semite. Though that seems to have changed a bit after we entered the ā€œBibi is trying to turn Israel into a dictatorshipā€ arc and heā€™s not seen as the savior of Israel anymore. But it weirds me out to see these talking points coming out of real life political commentators who I would usually expect to be at least somewhat level headed. In general, with exceptions from the usual crazies and outside places like Twitter, I have yet to find the big leftist pro-Hamas discourse everyone seems to pretend is all around.


  • Itā€™s why I happily soak up the downvotes all the time from the pro-Hamas crowd on here.

    The second part of this sentence is likely why youā€™re downvoted. The whole ā€œeveryone who disagress with me is pro-Hamas / anti-semiticā€ is tiring, disingenuous, shoves aside any possible good faith discussion, and Iā€™d argue itā€™s actually destructive as it muddies the definition of these terms. Anti-semite specifically is a term I donā€™t think people should be throwing around willy nilly, but by this point, 99% of the time I see it used in online discourse it describes someone who doesnā€™t think mass civilian bombings are OK, and maybe 1% actual anti-semites. Itā€™s basically the right wing version of some ā€œleftistsā€ calling people fascists for having the slightest right of center opinion.

    I usually either scroll past any mention of these or downvote and move on because itā€™s too tiring to devote time to people who, most of the time, are arguing in bad faith.




  • Ask the hundreds of millions of corpses in Indonesia, Brazil, Guatemala, Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Libya, Iraq, Syria, Grenada, Iran, etc, etc. if they think liberalism ā€˜wonā€™t actually try to kill themā€™ if they have an opinion that isnā€™t aligned with capitalist interests.

    Yeah, sorry, Iā€™m gonna pass. Like I told the guy above, Iā€™m sure whatever definition of Liberalism you use fits whatever point youā€™re trying to make, but unless you have a specific point to make, Iā€™m not going through all of these countriesā€™ histories in search of how ā€œliberalismā€ has led to hundreds of millions of corpses. Especially because I see Brazil in that list and Iā€™m familiar enough with its history to bet your definition of ā€œliberalismā€ is actually fascism, so Iā€™d rather not bite.

    ā€™Tankieā€™ is literally the word your sect uses to describe Marxist Leninists

    I donā€™t use tankie to describe marxist leninists. Iā€™ve made that very clear in my comment above. Like the person above, you seem to be trying to mix concepts in order to attack points I havenā€™t made. I also wonder what sect you think Iā€™m a part of. Iā€™d ask you to at least pretend youā€™re arguing in good faith and, if you truly want to argue, argue against the points Iā€™ve made, not the strawman youā€™ve made up in your mind. Thought that would probably mean veering off the pre-approved script.

    Such as? By the way workerā€™s rights and socialism cannot be attained simply by voting

    The communist party in my country is very fond of aligning with the new far right party when it comes to womenā€™s right - which arenā€™t an issue according to the communist leader, as only workersā€™ rights are a true issue - and minority rights in general. It was a bit surprising to some when they decided to walk that path, but I guess we shouldā€™ve known.

    As for workersā€™ rights, a combination of voting, strikes and protests have worked fairly well for my countryā€™s history. A lot of unions in the past 20 or so years have steered away from the communist party, given their alleged attempts at suppression, and have become independent. The communist party has been continually losing votes as it clings to fringe topics such as the defense of dictatorships and often attacks unions which try to act in a democratic manner and pick leaders among the workers, instead of accepting the outside leaders the Party had decreed.

    But what would you propose as an alternative to voting and protesting? Terrorism?

    Examples?

    I donā€™t know if youā€™ve accidentally only cropped part of what you intended to. Do I really need to show you examples of the far right trying to sell the idea that everyone to the left aligns with dictatorships? You can just look up any interview of any far right leader in europe and youā€™ll probably find your example. Thought Iā€™m confused why you need examples of that.


  • This isnā€™t comparable to my Auschwitz comparison, because this picks two unrelated things. The USSR also didnā€™t genocide millions of Ukrainians.

    They are as related as your two picks. The meat of the comparison was simply how you cherry pick a bad thing about the horrible dictatorship you dislike and something good about the horrible dictatorship you like.

    I donā€™t see a difference between Marxist-leninism, ā€œStalinismā€ (not a real thing, though sometimes people use the term), and communism. Iā€™m happy to go into the nuts and bolts, if youā€™d find that interesting. Iā€™ll try to use Marxism-leninism going forward, if thatā€™s easier.

    There is a very distinct difference between Marxism, Marxist-leninism, Stalinism, etc. I couldnā€™t tell you what communism means in the modern world. Just going through a list of communist parties in europe, for example, they all defend such radically different things that even they donā€™t seem to agree on what communism means. I appreciate your offer to inform me, but unlike most communists, Iā€™ve read Marxā€™s works. Cool stuff. Shame many modern day communist movements have completely thrown out that whole part about workersā€™ rights and class struggles and have gone full into adopting far right conspiracies in order to grab hold of the extremist votes as what used to be their main talking points has been normalized as is mostly still defended by movements closer to the center.

    If these are the reasons you oppose both fascism and Marxism-leninism, do you oppose Liberalism the same amount?

    I donā€™t oppose Marxism-leninism. Tankies are by definition not marxist. I donā€™t understand why you keep shifting the conversation to try and mix tankies with actual communists. Itā€™s usually the far right who tries to argue that people who might be favourable to marxist rhetoric are the exact same as people who condone genocides commited by states which defined themselves as ā€œcommunistā€, so itā€™s extra weird to have to defend this notion from a supposedly marxist-leninist.

    As for Liberalism, like with Communism, I donā€™t really know what it actually means. What americans call Liberalism is practically the opposite of what is described as Liberalism in European politics, which itself is fundamentally different from something like classical liberalism, so youā€™d have to be more specific. Having said that, none of these groups usually defend genocidal actions, so I donā€™t ā€œopposeā€ them in the sense I oppose fascists and stalinists. I might disagree with everything they stand for, depending again on the kind of liberalism weā€™re talking about, but at least I know they wonā€™t actually try to kill me.




  • ā€œPeople who built the Volkswagen, people who genocided millions of Ukrainians, whatā€™s the difference?ā€

    Just thought Iā€™d turn your line around. Itā€™s fun to reduce the atrocities of a movement to a good thing they did. Though the OP didnā€™t even mention communists at all, he mentioned tankies, as in the people who actively deny the atrocities of stalinism and maoism. Itā€™s weird that youā€™d jump to defending communism.

    Youā€™re right that thereā€™s a difference between fascists and tankies/ stalinists. And if this were a discussion in an academic setting, that might actually matter. But in an online discussion about the evils of both, it sort of doesnā€™t really matter. They both have a track record of authoritarianism and mass genocides, and I donā€™t get along well with people which defend either.



  • While I understand the sentiment, I hate this trend that whenever someones talks about how soulless the internet has become, the answer is always Web 1.0.

    I donā€™t want web 1.0. I like having CSS and Javascript around. I use them to build things I couldnā€™t with HTML alone, and Iā€™ve seen countless incredibly creative websites which fundamentally couldnā€™t have been built without Javascript. Itā€™s weird to me how the article mentions the creative aspect of the old web, versus the commercial aspect and ā€œsameynessā€ of the current web, only to then toss out tools that allow for even more creativity and personalization in the current web.

    Whenever I finish reading one of these articles it always feels like itā€™s mostly nostalgia and not much else.


  • Itā€™s gotten pretty bad lately and by this point I do feel like I see more misinformation on here than on Reddit. Lemmy has successfully managed to become more like Reddit than Reddit itself.

    Itā€™s kinda sad, there were a few days in which it really felt like this space would be different, but right now, I either go on /sub and barely see any content because most of the communities I want to follow are fairly inactive, or I go on /all and itā€™s mostly americans calling eachother Nazis over the slightest political disagreement, middle-class doomers going on about how their lives are horrible even though theyā€™re better off than most of the world and every ā€œseriousā€ community, whether itā€™s news or politics or etc. is filled to the brim with misinformation (and more doomers).

    People are already circlejerking below about capitalism over this fake pic, nice, cheers.