![](https://discuss.tchncs.de/pictrs/image/1c9a10b5-6684-4a94-8b85-7f1e55771c14.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8286e071-7449-4413-a084-1eb5242e2cf4.png)
Desktop Applications
Desktop Applications
One of the most controversial changes of Chrome’s MV3 approach is the removal of blocking WebRequest, which provides a level of power and flexibility that is critical to enabling advanced privacy and content blocking features. Unfortunately, that power has also been used to harm users in a variety of ways. Chrome’s solution in MV3 was to define a more narrowly scoped API (declarativeNetRequest) as a replacement. However, this will limit the capabilities of certain types of privacy extensions without adequate replacement.
Mozilla will maintain support for blocking WebRequest in MV3. To maximize compatibility with other browsers, we will also ship support for declarativeNetRequest. We will continue to work with content blockers and other key consumers of this API to identify current and future alternatives where appropriate. Content blocking is one of the most important use cases for extensions, and we are committed to ensuring that Firefox users have access to the best privacy tools available.
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2022/05/18/manifest-v3-in-firefox-recap-next-steps/
Librewolf explicitly reject donations.
Ah okay, so you’re not attempting to deprecate ALSA. That’s a relief! :)
The most recent commit is removing it again. I see no reason in the commits for this back and forth ALSA removal, do you know what it is about?
Intervene? I don’t think they have that kind of power ;)
Thank you.
Interesting that they’ll make it a user choice. Who would answer yes?
On 22 July 2024, Google announced that it is changing its approach to Privacy Sandbox. Instead of removing third-party cookies from Chrome, it will be introducing a user-choice prompt, which will allow users to choose whether to retain third party cookies.
Do you have a source for that excus… uehm… claim?
I think most PDF readers support Javascript. I use xpdf and one of the reasons is that it does not support Javascript.
Unless someone has registered the trademark for those specific purposes you’re clear. A trademarks is only valid within a specific field of purpose. Trademarks are there to avoid consumers mistaking one brand for another.
There are a lot of entertaining articles on Techdirt about companies not understanding trademark law.
Nice, but it is not entirely without JS. There is a tracking script from scorecardresearch.com
Sadly Sci-Hub has not received updated articles in several years. Alexandra is waiting for the outcome of the trial in India. I don’t think it depends on what the outcome is, just that the trial needs to be over.
Thanks for the archive link, even if I prefer Techdirt for these kind of news, it was nice of you to save me from visiting Wired.
Does anyone know of a list of TLDs that don’t allow reselling? I’d prefer to buy/lease one of those and let domain sharks play their own games.
I use gitit and it’s already packaged in most Linux distros.
TLDR; Sorta federation. It is possible to selfhost data.
Yeah, that container probably crashed because of atmospheric disturbance.
It sounds like you already know how to make Web 1.0 websites.
I use Devuan and it’s just Debian without systemd.
dom.push.enabled = false