• 25 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle


  • Also, Safari on Windows had low usage, and was probably a pain to maintain. Swift cross platform is more about abstracting out Apple specific things (like the standard library and UI toolkit). Apple has already been investing multi-year efforts into Swift on the server for longer than Safari on Windows existed. The last couple versions of Swift (~3-4years of development) have been almost entirely focused on safe concurrency, which is intended for server-side development.






  • I believe they’re referring to lower down in the article, where the researchers analyzed existing extensions on the marketplace:

    After the successful experiment, the researchers decided to dive into the threat landscape of the VSCode Marketplace, using a custom tool they developed named ‘ExtensionTotal’ to find high-risk extensions, unpack them, and scrutinize suspicious code snippets.

    Through this process, they have found the following:

    • 1,283 with known malicious code (229 million installs).
    • 8,161 communicating with hardcoded IP addresses.
    • 1,452 running unknown executables.
    • 2,304 that are using another publisher’s Github repo, indicating they are a copycat.








  • Do you mean admonitions? E.g. info, warning, etc? There’s precedent for that in commonly-used open source implementations, e.g. obsidian.md (which uses the same syntax, and started before). What semantics does it break? It’s designed to read well in plaintext and render nicely even if used in a renderer that doesn’t support admonitions, e.g.

    [!NOTE] Information the user should notice even if skimming.

    As opposed to other common markdownish implementations that use nonsensical plaintext which renders poorly in alternative renderers. Here’s a discussion on the topic in the CommonMark forums.