Did he? My recollection is that he gave her a 70% chance of winning, which is not at all the same as predicting that she will win.

Replace the overhead light with a desk lamp, get a rug and some wall hangings in there, maybe some fairy lights, a little bookshelf. Could be super cozy.

They’re by different writers, and I know on their podcast I have heard people disagree in the past about things like whether a polling difference is meaningful, so maybe they’re just each calling it like they see it.

Innocent people plead guilty or no contest to charges all the time, tbh. I think what’s crazy is running for office as a member of the party famous for its calls of “law and order” after spending eight years in the big house at the hands of the “law.” You might think that would clue you in that maybe the legal system is not all it’s cracked up to be.

In the section about his personal life, it says that he is sometimes invited to preach at churches. I think that’s about the extent of it.

This protects him from prosecution but doesn’t require other officials to help him break the law. States don’t need the president’s approval to run elections, and Congress doesn’t need his approval to certify the votes of electors in the presidential election specifically.

Jesus Christ, they’re like the villains from Captain Planet.

He is also in the article, yes.

Well I suspect he thought that France might waive the ban because the Senate had invited him specifically. I imagine the police will be getting an angry phone call from a senator.

A while ago I spent 20 minutes doing captchas to try to reset the password to my Steam account. I finally Googled to see if it usually took so many, and it turned out to just be bugged, lmao. Had to reset it through the mobile app instead, IIRC.

So, uh, are we doing World War 3 now? Just asking because I need to know if I should be canceling my summer plans and investing in canned food.

A measuring cup is a specific size, about 237mL. There’s a whole system of US measurements, actually:

3 teaspoons in a tablespoon

2 tablespoons in an ounce

8 ounces in a cup

2 cups in a pint

2 pints in a quart

4 quarts in a gallon

Not all cups are measuring cups; if you are having a cup of coffee that doesn’t mean your cup is exactly 8oz. You just infer from context that if someone is talking about ingredients then you should measure them with a measuring cup. (Very commonly you also see cups with graduated markings, which are US Imperial on one side and metric on the other, that go up to 2 cups/500mL.)

I would think this was cute. It’s low-stakes, playful boundary pushing that indicates flirtatious interest.

I don’t know, I didn’t write it!

Edit: Wait I get it, if you bracket the statements differently (so that “do not have” applies to each one instead of all of them) you get (!A && !B && !C) instead of !(A && B && C). That seems super unintuitive and I can’t believe the majority claimed that there’s no ambiguity, when I feel like they’ve chosen the much less obvious interpretation.

Very cool! I’m looking forward to it, but it also seems like the first expac that I might not want to enable for every playthrough, which is interesting—I wonder if we’ll see more of these themed packs going forward.

Ahhh I see. That second-from-last comic image where he’s dodging lasers was the first one I found, and I was like “Wait it says this is from 2016 and he kinda looks like this Agustini guy already?”

So the controversy actually predates the casting, it just brought it back to the forefront.

Before I expanded the post to see the tagline, I was like “Wow, I didn’t know those Anglicans were so zealous.” ^^;;

How did you learn they were tourists? Is there a better article?

The losses are being distributed among society while the corporation keeps the profits. No one thinks this is actual socialism, that is the whole point of the saying.