• 0 Posts
  • 108 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 8th, 2023

help-circle
  • Sure, but before things can become commonplace we need voices advocating for the direction of that change. That’s my goal. To be a voice.

    Also, irrelevant to you, but: I might need a new Lemmy account. Connect isn’t working for me and I can’t find which e-mail I used to sign up for Lemmy. Super annoying, because I keep needing to search for the posts that I commented on, and then find the comments themselves in order to reply. My inbox just gives me errors about not finding the posts… but they’re obviously still here


  • Yeah, that’s gotta suck and I’m 100% not against people talking about who they are if they WANT to. What irritates me is the labels people are forced carry.

    Like “wow a woman was finally able to achieve what men can achieve” or “wow this gay man was finally able to acheive what straight men can achieve” and that’s the part that annoys me

    Eta: I think it’s meant well, but it implies that there’s something “special” about these people that allows them to climb the ranks previously reserved for a select group of people

    So to truly be inclusive, things like “race” and gender and sexuality should be looked at as variations of normal, the same way hair color or height is looked at

    2nd edit: Ok, sorry, but just to clarify I’m not harping on straight, white, males here. Swinging the pendulum the exact opposite way doesn’t help, either. I’m seeing this more as a societal thing that I’d liked to see changed


  • My guess is that it’s to avoid something like finding records of a past leader who is gay, and them then being the first

    My issue with this is: why does their sexuality even matter? It’s their GD business

    Eta: I also hate this with race and gender. “First woman to…” why? Why are we so focused on the color of people’s skin, their religion, what’s between their legs, or who they love?

    I want to live in a world where a mixed-heritage lesbian woman is elected and no-one bats an eye, or mentions anything about it unless it comes up organically by the person elected. Otherwise the only legit question should be: is this person the best candidate for the job?

    Ok Ill get off my soap box now











  • I’m somewhat similar, but I’m also extremely easily distracted. I can’t hold multiple things in my mind for longer than two or three steps ahead. And then anything that comes along to break me out of it and I’m just done. It’s super frustrating, especially because I have the kind of mind that bounces different perspectives around all the time. It’s like I just want to reach out and grab a thought to think it through thouroughly before I get to the next but… nope





  • In my mind it has to do with gametes. If an intersex person has functional ovaries that produce eggs that are fertilized with sperm, can carry the fetus to term and give birth- then they’re closer to female

    If they can do that, but also have functional testes that produce viable sperm, can get an errection and impregnate a partner then I’d still even count them closer to biologically female if they produce eggs- but accept that they’re biologically perfectly intersex (and be highly impressed)

    Though as far as I remember reading the production of one hormone can interfere with the others, and so chances of pregnancy are slim. I don’t remember ever hearing of someone in the scenario above, tho .

    Yes I do know about XXY (present as taller than average women), or XYY (men) and the XY males who present as female until they grow a penis at puberty (low testosterone that kicks in only as a teen). All of that is fascinating, and I don’t dislike the variation in human beings! It’s nature trying new things and that’s neccessary for species to survive

    (And I truly don’t give a rats-ass how people identify. I’ll call people whatever name they want, and refer to them in whichever way they want even in private conversations that don’t include them. This is just how I’m currently categorizing biological sex in my own mind. There’s plenty of room for re-interpretation and if new terms are decided upon I’m fine with aquiring and using them )



  • rosymind@leminal.spacetoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldHeadlines be like
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I have one and it’s exquisite. My husband had originally proposed with a dull, heart-shaped blood-diamond that cost him about 10k. I think he could tell that I didn’t like it, and told me it could be returned.

    I felt bad for not liking the first, but worse about the thought of some poor lil kid digging it up in Africa. We found a synthetic diamond that is PERFECT and glitters like crazy. I’m extremely happy with my synthetic diamond ring. It’s the prettiest piece of jewelry that I’ve ever owned. Highly recommended