![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
The SRA exists; actual leftists know and understand that the second amendment is not limited to maga hogs
The SRA exists; actual leftists know and understand that the second amendment is not limited to maga hogs
Those covers had to be redesigned because the originals (which may be the ones in the pic) would gouge the rubber of the tires
Biden wins, there *will* be a different Democratic nominee in 2028. And if you want it to be someone more in line with your thinking than Biden, well you know what you gotta do in 2028.
I’d say it needs to be sooner than ‘28, more like as soon as the election is over
Venus isn’t a planet either. It’s a hell-sphere. But that makes it even more rad 🤘
Ah, I think I misread something, got it
The aid packages were separate votes, most did not vote against aid for Israel
Israel aid and Ukraine aid were two separate votes
Because the Soviet Union was a communist dictatorship, which the GOP hated (the communist part of it, anyway), and modern Russia is kleptocratic oligarchy, which the GOP loves. Easy enough to tease out, really.
I preferred when they were originally Vin Diesel jokes, not the least in part because Chuck Norris is a chud
Bitchin’
I still use that, and I’m trying to bring def back but I got none of the rizz to do it
Okay, gotcha, I was looking at it from their point of view, which is that everything to them is bigotry, not realizing that that’s what you were saying in the first place. The bad, it is mine.
.ml tends to slap “rule 1” on everything, which says don’t be a bigot, even if that’s obviously not what the comment was about.
[emphasis mine]
Sure about that? From what I’ve seen, anything said in disagreement with the predominant opinion over there (and on hexbear, especially on hexbear) is deemed “bigotry”. They don’t appear to be interested in ingratiating anyone to the cause.
Bummer about those thalidomide arms though
That connectivity in hard-to-reach places—much like free speech absolutism—is conditional upon whether he (or the dictator of an invading force, with whom he agrees) will allow it
[edit] and apparently Starlink may not even be profitable, with its accounting described as “more art than science” which always bodes well
I’m hearing this in Dana Carvey’s Tom Brokaw.
“And he was delicious.”
That’s pretty much my argument, yeah. Also, to the people who support Israel because they want to usher in the return of Christ: they’re trying to force god’s will. Do they not understand that god would be absolutely wrathful over their arrogance? There’s no rapture for them. Not that there will be a rapture in the first place, but that’s beside the point.
[1] What’s to say that someone getting an abortion isn’t god’s will?
[2] How can anyone really claim to know what god’s will even is in the first place?
Banned, that’s what
I’d expect people on lemmy to know better; anywhere else though, yeah, fair