![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/d48ac7c9-92c1-47ae-bf39-9ee116fb736d.jpeg)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/8140dda6-9512-4297-ac17-d303638c90a6.png)
80%. Much beyond that and you get into a decreasing return on the investment of making the tests.
80%. Much beyond that and you get into a decreasing return on the investment of making the tests.
This is horse shit
Exactly this, because there is literally fuck all any of us can do to change this. Climate change is largely the result of a couple hundred mega corporations, not the masses choosing plastic drinking straws.
Ooooooh. I was thinking the outside was made of tuff.
Which, hey, bonus, amirite? Nothing beats a BLT with fresh, home-grown tomatoes to watch the much-quicker-than-anticipated demise of Earth.
clang bring out yer dead
Bow chicka bow wow
It’s an older crossover, but it checks out
And shitting (are we still shitting?)
I saw this same behavior the other day and was so confused! God, I’m glad you posted this. I’m not crazy! 😂
Well, I’m not crazy for this. There’s still the other things.
AKA the ball room
Bingo, exactly this. I said 80 because that’s typically what I see our projects get to after writing actually useful tests. But if your coverage is 80% and it’s all just tests verifying that a constant is still set to whatever value, then yeah, thats a useless metric.