![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
yeah, but it still specifically protected barons, not the common person
when he says this:
That’s how you get Magna Carta where the aristocrats, the most powerful people, go to the king and say, we want power too
he’s correct
yeah, but it still specifically protected barons, not the common person
when he says this:
That’s how you get Magna Carta where the aristocrats, the most powerful people, go to the king and say, we want power too
he’s correct
the magna carta protected the rights of some barons, not the common people, so he’s actually correct
oh no they’re not feeling okay
because you don’t seem it?
are you feeling okay, friend?
it’s genuinely fascinating to me that you think manga readership is equivalent to voting
like, it’s so strangely specific
is manga and the us election the only thing going on in your life?
i’m not sure national elections of a world superpower are followed on precisely the same level as attack on titan readership
if you’re asking what mechanism could be used to quantify “voter enthusiasm”, a poll of “do you intend to vote in this election” seems like a pretty easy and obvious answer
don’t most people have dynamic ips?
i think in the context of replacing her predecessor for health reasons it’s at least a little relevant
the media:
we’ll stop naming school shooters due to copycat killers
also the media:
his name was thomas matthew and here’s a 90 minute special about his preferred breakfast cereal
👀 👀 👀
The simulation designer would not be creative enough
now you’re making assumptions about how the creators of our simulation think, when we also know nothing about them
why would you assume they think in the same way we do? why would you assume what they do would even be considered “thinking” by us at all?
fall somewhere on the spectrum of having a complete inversion of the rules of their universe or having an exact copy of the rules of their universe
there are natural limits to what would be conceivable
firstly, i don’t think that holds true under the laws of our universe
secondly, why would it hold true under the laws of theirs?
okay?
“influenced by” doesn’t tell us anything about the concrete rules of the simulating universe
Or maybe whoever simulated our universe intentionally deviated from the rules of their universe for the fun of it.
likely it’s being run on a jupiter brain or matrioshka brain
if you accept the premise that our universe is a simulation, why would you assume anything we know about it follows the rules of the simulating universe?
he’s literally correct about what the magna carta is