![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/2QNz7bkA1V.png)
I use a combo of lutris and proton, if you’re looking for keywords.
I use a combo of lutris and proton, if you’re looking for keywords.
At least Linux isn’t trying to milk you for its own gain.
Omg, I feel sorry for the people cleaning up after those codebases later. Maintaing that kind of careless “quality” lines of code is going to be a job for actual veterans.
And when we’re all retired or dead, the whole world will be a pile of alien artifacts from a time when people were still able to figure stuff out, and llms will still be ridiculously inefficient for precise tasks, just like today.
Same as torrents, some form of signing keys?
I was thinking federation for the social aspect of it, not the distribution aspect of it.
Distribution would be “the usual”. Stores acquire software, and licenses, store and serve the data through a server. Client software solve installation and integration between games and social stuff, like friends, messages, networking and achievements.
I mean, it’s not a one person project, but if I were supreme leader of Vietnam and had the people and resources to be working on providing video game entertainment for the masses, that’s how I’d be thinking about it. Not that software skills and supreme leader skills have any overlap…
That’s Sovereignty.
Assuming approval is a strict requirement, a middle ground solution would be an open source, federatable, steam clone, operated locally. Have an approving committee to priorise approving games from local developers, and working on evaluating international games after all local games are dealt with.
That’s for sure similarly efficient to gaming industry distributors system, where you need companies with the right connections to launch games in big platforms, like sony’s, nintendo’s, or microsoft’s. Or event steam’s, to a minor extent. Which also veto games not aligned to their opaque terms and conditions.
Also, it would improve international competition, with the removal of the technology barrier of entry, distribution costs would lower, games would become cheaper, and the share retained by creators and developers would be increased.
Long live, a collaborative approach to technology! Long live smaller profit margins! Long live open source!
That’s why we need to negotiate in block, likely through unions.
So, that’s how Google funds their unprofitable products!
Damn, those copyleft extremists!
How about demanding better tools?
Can a democracy that doesn’t reflect and can’t act systematically for the needs of the people really be called a democracy?
And pray that the candidates elected on those platforms don’t backtrack for the lobby of big-whatever.
So… Who’s the board of mozilla hiring the ceo, again? How did this board come to be?
You can make solutions popular with a shit ton of money. Doesn’t necessarily make them good solutions.
The isntreal mistyping is on purpose.
There’s https://redbean.dev/, but it’s not quite what you mean.
It runs on the browser with a local host reference to a lua server with access to c libs.
Javascript has airbnb style guide, enforceable through eslint. There’s also react related eslint extensions to give you a lot of best practices to follow.
There’s also prettier, which is just about formatting.
Tanks go brrrrr!
Me too. And by having Linux in my primary boot, I mostly guarantee windows can’t wake itself up after I shut it down. :D
The best way to shutdown your windows computer is to install Linux.
Read the official rust book until you feel like want to experiment with something, then go to advent of code and try something, anything out.
Then start investigating why it doesn’t quite work. And I guess gpt for suggestions and random questions isn’t a bad idea.