![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
“We’re going to have some fun too.” GET IT K-DOG.
“We’re going to have some fun too.” GET IT K-DOG.
For an Internet discussion, I really appreciate your open and honest exchange. Good day fellow Internet person.
Ok next question, because I think I interpreted the term differently than you did.
There are two types of term limits right? Quantity of terms, and length of terms.
Status quo: Q - one term, L - for life.
Wouldn’t limiting the length but not the quantity maintain the incentive for impartiality? So there is no concept of a second term?
I’m not trolling btw, I’m looking for an honest airing of the Q.
ELI5, How does no term limits allow for impartiality?
We really need to revive The Name Of The Year bracket. That was a hidden internet gem.
Nah, it’s a clickbaity article title. He said something like “I’m not the one to worry about, it’s the next four.”
Well this is the most New Jersey thing I’ve seen today.
I see a lot of people talking about 3 years being relatively short. The point is not about keeping Trump out, it’s about putting the independent CEO in. 3 years is a long time for an independent CEO to dismantle the company and fix a ton of shady stuff.
Plus I love Let’s stay together
There is a solid counter argument here (to play devil’s advocate). This is what a right wing American would say to this:
See, we don’t have to tax the rich, they’re so generous. It’s more efficient to let them have their money and donate it directly to causes. The federal government is so bad at allocating wealth, reducing taxes so more people can be like her is the way to go.
If the person above is not wealthy themselves, the following thought to this is Well, when I’m inevitably wealthy because of how great I am, I don’t want the government taxing me so I can be like her.
Then they pat themselves on the back for being so ((in an impossible future)) generous.
It’s worth thinking about how to counter this argument.
But not a bad daydream
Tradition to do WHAT EXACTLY?? TO DO WHAT …???
I was kidding in my comment.
I also don’t agree with people down-voting you. Even assholes who should be in jail for-eva don’t deserve mob-centric and humiliation as punishment. I very much want “us” to be better than “them” and not sink that low.
I really should have used /s
Anyone have the sauce?
This is too real to be a “shit post”
Well we are kinda already talking about a guy that DGAF about the rule of law. However, I think this is what you’re looking for: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
Task failed successfully.