![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/527a4d42-31a3-47d0-8990-69e34e23d85a.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0943eca5-c4c2-4d65-acc2-7e220598f99e.png)
So, a hole in a bucket? Doesn’t sound right.
So, a hole in a bucket? Doesn’t sound right.
Someone else in another thread I read recently, I think they worked for Microsoft at some point, said that it’s due for different departments all competing for corporate attention. Doing the big new thing to keep their job. Rather than just fine tuning for performance or longevity. Something like that.
They love on them. Tap that bark.
Holy shit yeah that’s a step up from drone grenades footage, nice!
Appreciate the informative response! I’m ashamed to say it hadn’t ever occurred to me that a missile still needs to follow a ballistic path. I’ve been fooled by movies without realising the nonsense in that, given they have no ‘wings’. Control surfaces aside of course. Thanks!
Sorry for ignorance, genuine question, how is this different to a short range missile?
If it was massed, (I’d prefer amassed), wouldn’t it be better as "Russia have massed…?
Wiggle the little stalk at the top, if it wiggles nicely, it’s ripe. Takes a little to get the feel for wiggle to ripe ratio, but it’s a really good indicator.
Ahh yup.