fkn

I think this makes them a good human… Since like 99% of humans are bad at math it makes sense since they would make this mistake…

Lol. This isn’t my argument. This is your argument followed more completely.

You don’t even know what my argument is or what my beliefs are. All I have done is point out your own hypocrisy.

You know how I know you are lying? Because your first reaction to me expanding on your argument was to tell me I am a sinner.

If you treat any of your “friends” that way you are truly a terrible person.

You don’t like being called a fundamentalist because you know they are abhorrent.

You don’t like your own argument. You can’t even stomach the inkling that your own hypocrisy.

Removed by mod

Even if we grant you your invalid position, you are still wrong. So close. You claim the unborn person has rights, but so did the mother.

In no legal jurisdiction in the United States is one person ever required to give up their bodily autonomy for another. This the mother, according to your argument, is under no legal obligation to provide the other person, according to your argument, the mothers body for any reason. If the mother wishes to discontinue the use of her body she can. If the other person dies as a result of this decision, the mother bears no responsibility.

This is well understood case law and common law.

GTFO with this terrible argument.

Exactly. The points you put together made no argument. I asked “so what?” And indicated that the points as presented appear to be the same points people use/put together to say: “so don’t vote.” / are used by the same group of people who are trying to disenfranchise or discourage voting. This is a common propaganda technique.

I haven’t made up shit. I stated what it looked like and they failed to repudiate it followed by calling me names.

See. This is the big where your argument seems insincere.

Again. And?

It still sounds like you are one of those “it’s broken so don’t vote” assholes.

And? Just because I am not a fan of how the democratic party is run doesn’t mean I’m not going to vote for them.

There are a lot of problems… But this argument is awfully close to apologetics for Trump.

I don’t think either is actually true. I know many programmers who can fix a problem once the bug is identified but wouldn’t be able to find it themselves nor would they be able to determine if a bug is exploitable without significant coaching.

Exploit finding is a specific skill set that requires thinking about multiple levels of abstraction simultaneously (or intentionally methodically). I have found that most programmers simply don’t do this.

I think the definition of “good” comes into play here, because the vast majority of programmers need to dependably discover solutions to problems that other people find. Ingenuity and multilevel abstract thinking are not critically important and many of these engineers who reliably fix problems without hand holding are good engineers in my book.

I suppose that it could be argued that finding the source of a bug from a bug report requires detective skills, but even this is mostly guided inspection with modern tooling.

I… Mean… You obviously don’t, but whatever.

Sorry. I apologize.

It’s frustrating trying to explain the same thing over and over again…

The tokens are how drm works. The process of DRM is token validation and enforcement of intellectual property rights granted by tokens.

I don’t know how else to explain it. It feels like I am back at my original post. I don’t know if you understand any better or if you still have misconceptions about what NFTs are or what DRM is or if you still think there is some magic in NFTs.

Again, all of this already existed and will continue to exist with or without blockchain. There is very little novel in the implementation details of the tokens. The people who got the idea for "nft"s didn’t come up with a new idea. This isn’t some new math. The only portion of NFTs that is new is the cooperative signing… Which again, isn’t a new concept either.

Right now, everything you described… Literally all of it… Ubisoft implements for their launcher and enforce with their drm solution.

Nfts, digital tokens, already exist. Their use, in the protection of copyright, is called drm. “Nfts” bring nothing new to the table of digital rights or copyright… And a whole host of stupidity.

I mean… According to the story… Yes?

The entire Weasley clan is shown to have a depth and breadth of magical understanding that the average wizard doesn’t. They are critical players in the organization that defeats Voldemort and they rub elbows with the most famous and politically powerful wizards on a regular basis.

I also think it’s just supposed to be hard to make new magic and the spells that are common were built to be common.

For example, it is possible for anyone to write a new program for their phone. How many people actually can or do? How many people, with some training, can use most of not all of the programs that others have built to be productive.

I do know it, via magic. You can’t prove I don’t know, because you’re a muggle.

Fax, predating the telephone by about 7 years.