I am not inciting violence, at all. I have repeatedly said I disagree with it.

But at some points in history, when we can look back, I think its valid to consider what could have been done differently.

When I ask these questions, I am not saying violence is the only answer. I am wondering what other pathways could have been taken

Could the german people have rid themselves of the nazis without violence? That would of course be preferred.

Could the US civil war, which really was about “we want slaves”, instead have been entirely nonviolent instead?

Could the american revolutionaries created a new country separate from the british empire, without violence?

Im not american, im just watching the dumpster fire burning while asking sincere questions about it, and wondering at what point drawing parallels stops being “hurr they arent nazis”

No I completely agree. I am just posing the hypothetical of when “political violence” moves into effectively “battle for survival under an oppressive regime”

I think the point I am making is slightly different. I am not suggesting the german people should have killed hitler, job done. I specifically said to overthrow their government.

If the implication isn’t obvious - at what point should the german people have risen up and began a civil war to overthrow the entire nazi government.

Not just one single person, because like you pointed out, it wouldn’t have changed much in the grand scheme.

stoop to murder

on principal I completely agree.

But heres a comparison people will likely cry about.

At what point from hitlers starting point in politics, to his suicide in the bunker, should the german people have started committing violence to overthrow their government?

Do you side with the soviet revolutionaries, or the Tsar?

The revolutionaries? So you are advocating for the murder of not only the leader, but his young children too.

I can use my tag, which I put in my wallet or suitcase … as a photo shutter? How is this groundbreaking?

I have never wanted to do anything with my airtags except attach them, and replace batteries when required

creating what doubles as a dedicated hardware shortcut button always available in your backpack or carry-on

at no point has my tag, in carry on or a backpack, ever been more accessible than my phone or watch.

Take phone out of my pocket and trigger shortcut

or

dig through an airplane overhead, get my carry on bag to find a tag to press a button to activate a shortcut on my phone? I really do not understand how this is functionality anyone would

You’ve interacted with all trans folk on the platform, made note of their disability status, and worked out a percentage of the population?

Or maybe, just maybe you’ve seen a few which you took note of, ignored other posts that didn’t catch your eye because they didn’t mention disabilities.

1 billion dollars clawed back, minimum of 250k tax debt.

So a minimum of 4000 individuals? Assuming theyre clawing back the full amounts owed in one go

edit

additional detail from another source

As part of larger efforts taking place, the IRS has stepped up activity specifically on 1,600 individuals whose incomes were more than $1 million per year and who each owed the IRS more than $250,000 in recognized tax debt. Since last fall, this IRS compliance effort has generated more than $1 billion in collections from this group, with work continuing in this area.

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-tops-1-billion-in-past-due-taxes-collected-from-millionaires-compliance-efforts-continue-involving-high-wealth-groups-corporations-partnerships

So 1billion from 1600 individuals, they pulled back on average 650k per person

“Under stand? What? I am seated not standing” - person elected by, and to represent, conservatives.

Maybe “radical conservative extremist” is more appropriate

conservative firebrand

This term is way too polite.

Why post this article targeting one party when this one is much more broad

https://www.declassifieduk.org/israel-lobby-funded-a-quarter-of-british-mps/

Or the full list of MPs

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vQJ34ufwob2saDo1Zjhx2DM6Rp1Vsx9AHdIEAVtQidI/htmlview?pli=1#gid=298877686

It would take vast quantities of energy and resources if you were to do it real time, full time.

As in - in the simulation 1 minute could be 1 year outside the simulation. Assuming we can continue to use more energy sources, develop the technology to fully simulate a single reality, it wouldn’t necessarily have to be real time.

Inside the simulation, it wouldn’t make a difference

Over the years Ive worked up the salary I earn. I am not wealthy, just earn more than most. I am bad with money at the best of times, but I found my spending just naturally grew as I had more available to spend. If I was suddenly ultra wealthy, at the start I would probably live “normally” but honestly I would likely end up spending vastly more money just because its there

unforgivable

yeah absolutely agreed

on desktop devices

Kinda should have been in the headline

what sabotage?

good bye, office of the presidency or whatever official name it had

welcome to the title of king of america

Why would the NATO chief comment on the president’s health at all?