minus-squarearchon@sh.itjust.workstoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Stay Mad, Tankieslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 months agoSo, you’re saying that’s all it takes for you to consider a convicted conman for president instead? Sound reasonable. You may not be happy with your options, but the choice is abundantly clear. linkfedilink
So, you’re saying that’s all it takes for you to consider a convicted conman for president instead? Sound reasonable.
You may not be happy with your options, but the choice is abundantly clear.