![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/a540ca9a-3496-4e62-9060-616f0464f097.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
I thought it was neuroin
I thought it was neuroin
It’s not mutually exclusive, which of his policies are actually focusing on Americans?
>This is what Israel is using white phosphorus for, but the article is biased and never mentions it
<After rights groups accused Israel of war crimes for its use of white phosphorus in its 2008-09 Gaza offensive, the Israeli military said it would stop using it as smokescreen munitions in built-up areas, with unspecified exceptions.
The US and many other countries use white phosphorus based smoke munitions too, and it is not a war crime
That is true, but using it as an incendiary weapon in civilian areas is.
If you don’t like Al Jazeera, here’s another source.
none of that has anything to do with what I said, go seethe about democrats on your blog, I don’t care what your 5th grade teacher said because it has nothing to do with democratic policies
If they think religion needs protection, they are easily manipulated.
Leaning too heavily into Israel and siding with genocide.
Leaning too heavily against, and being accused of being pro-Hamas.
So the choices are siding with genocide, and merely being accused of being pro-Hamas?
Seems like a clear choice, since accusations of being pro-Hamas get flung around for merely wanting to genocide Palestinians just more slowly.
a vote for any candidate is a vote against all other candidates.
That is simply not the political reality we find ourselves in.
Demonstrably untrue, splitting the vote always helps the other party despite casting no additional votes for their candidate.
Killing people = homicide
First time with a rhetorical question?
Except out of date food carries a risk, and non-halal does not.
non-halal
Muslims are allowed to eat haram if they would otherwise starve, this kind of nitpicking is very elucidatory. Like, would you rather less food be delivered, or delivered with more delay, just to ensure it sticks to rules which are not even applicable to this scenario?
Using speech patterns of libs that was obsolescent even in 2016 just highlights how infrequently you legitimately consider differing thought and is a great signifier to others that you really have nothing to offer except the surface level catchphrases you use to reinforce your beliefs to yourself.
Ay caramba
a man would just get frustrated abt a woman yelling though
Thank you for completely disregarding the emotions of half the planet, very cool and very humanizing
nice whataboutism, still didn’t answer the question though
because they are most certainly not
lol, lmao even
interference in Israel’s ability to secure itself
So we shouldn’t interfere then, and let them buy their own weapons with their own money?
it’s like you only read half of the comment and raced to post this reply…
Nice ad hominem, thank you for putting your poor faith on display right away, but no, I was merely just addressing the points as presented.
the reason why you need more than 5 rifle rounds, IS NOT about stopping power
So why did they say the rifle needed more than the handgun?
It’s about giving you more than enough chances to land hits
So the numbers should be the same then, no?
Precise shooting in a stressful environment is really fucking hard, your heart is hammering your hands are shaking, you realize this could be the end. All of these factors heavily affect shooting ability in the moment.
Which is dangerous for anyone nearby.
you are making a lot of assumptions here, like assuming it’s home defense shooting 556 or the like
Seems like you’re the one making assumptions, champ, all I implied is higher caliber, because I don’t think people often refer to .22 carbines as rifles.
What happens when you’re out in the wilderness and end up in a face off with a bear or a cougar? There are so many complex settings and situations and here you are framing the conversation as if this only applies to defending your bedroom or hallway.
Okay, so how many shots do you think you need for a bear, or for a cougar? Because even if you’re squeezing your trigger as fast as possible, a cougar is gonna be able to finish you before you finish your 30 round mag.
Not every home defenser has 5.56 or .300blk. Plenty of “assault weapons” that shoot pistol calibers
oh cute, a nice little strawman to finish with, almost needed a reminder that you were a bad faith actor. Didn’t say anything about assault weapons though, scare quotes were cute though, definitely keep that up.
If the goal is to stop someone in 5 seconds, why would you need more rounds for the higher caliber rifle? Seems like 5 rifle rounds and 12-15 pistol rounds would be enough stopping power.
But if your argument is more chances to hit, well then you’re just advocating for more rounds going somewhere other than there target, and 30 (high caliber rifle) rounds is certainly too much to fire out your walls willy nilly.
Great, start with yourself