Well they certainly weren’t building infrastructure for their own citizens with all the materials and money. shrug
Probably the fact that they started a war on Oct. 7th that they can’t win, as a starting point for escalation of conflict specifically.
Out of curiosity, why are no other countries accepting Palestinian refugees?
Seems more “anti-authoritarian-communism” than anything.
deleted by creator
It’s widely accepted that this does not qualify as genocide. Why do people keep on insisting the false narratives?
It does seem comforting knowing that the hexbear people are such a tiny fringe minority that they’re likely to have very little impact unless they are or become domestic terrorists in any significant number (I could see a few of them suicide-bombing in major cities, coordinated, but they’ll Darwin themselves out of existence eventually without leaving any real impact on this earth.)
Why do people insist on partisan rhetoric? Your point could have been made better without the constant, cliche, stereotypical anti-Republican partisan rhetoric that you find in every comment about everything.
You can tell that the population in this thread is not aware of how hunting rifles function.
“Unrestricted” is quite a leap, I have to pass background checks, and depending on state, there is a waiting period before I can take the firearm home. Concealed carry also requires classes with certificates and gun range proof with instructors, and FBI fingerprint check and storage in their database forever.
*Anecdote.
I’m betting the truth is somewhere in between, models are only as good as their training data – so over time if they prune out the bad key/value pairs to increase overall quality and accuracy it should improve vastly improve every model in theory. But the sheer size of the datasets they’re using now is 1 trillion+ tokens for the larger models. Microsoft (ugh, I know) is experimenting with the “Phi 2” model which uses significantly less data to train, but focuses primarily on the quality of the dataset itself to have a 2.7 B model compete with a 7B-parameter model.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/phi-2-the-surprising-power-of-small-language-models/
In complex benchmarks Phi-2 matches or outperforms models up to 25x larger, thanks to new innovations in model scaling and training data curation.
This is likely where these models are heading to prune out superfluous, and outright incorrect training data.
Doesn’t that suppress valid information and truth about the world, though? For what benefit? To hide the truth, to appease advertisers? Surely an AI model will come out some day as the sum of human knowledge without all the guard rails. There are some good ones like Mistral 7B (and Dolphin-Mistral in particular, uncensored models.) But I hope that the Mistral and other AI developers are maintaining lines of uncensored, unbiased models as these technologies grow even further.
How can you tell? Do you think it’s on purpose, or just the result of so much AI art being pumped into the interwebs for the last year?
I am genuinely perplexed at the amount of mental gymnastics you are doing to justify attacking civilian ships from other countries that are not enemy combatants. Incredible Olympic display of psychological back-flips.
I finally made the plunge to Linux desktop for all work in 2016 and have not looked back (and occasional windows VM, extremely rare now.) Even Arch is now perfectly fine as a workstation which surprised me. Recommend EndeavourOS to streamline the install process but it’s Arch underneath.
Is it possible for you to rephrase that comment? Don’t quite understand what you are getting at.
deleted by creator
I’m sure circles fit into string theory somehow too.
Why are Israel’s prisoners terrorists and Hamas’ hostages elders and civilian women? Seems like an imbalance overall.