But it has seen an impact, it resulted in the JCPOA

You asked for an example of a country changing its attitude, that is what happened in Iran to negotiate the nuclear deal. Now you are moving the goal posts and claiming that it wasn’t sufficiently successful in the long run. That may well be, but it has nothing to do with the presence or absence of sanctions.

I also want to point out that sanctions often work far more subtly than what you imagine. If six months from now, Ukraine and Russia engage in successful peace talks, sanctions will certainly have played a role in shifting Russia’s position closer to that of Ukraine, but on the surface it will be impossible to tell by how much.

Edit my comment to add the Iran example

The goal is to make the cost of waging war increasingly painful to pay. There is no other way to effectively do this than to target the entire country.

Off the top my head, the sanctions on Iran were pretty effective to get them to negotiate the nuclear deal. Until Trump tore that one up, that is.

There is no other way

The courts decide if a party can be banned the government can only initiate the process, also most experts on constitutional law seem to be of the opinion that a ban for the whole party is unlikely and even if it succeeded the would just be a replacement party stepping in to fill the void.

Just try it one more time bro, it will be different this time, bro, I swear price caps will work this time just try it bro

What are you on about? You can just turn off auto updates or revert back to previous versions.

You wouldn’t like it if you owned three houses and have all your savings invested in them

How is that relevant?

This has been well known for years. Just because it’s news to you doesn’t mean it’s a conspiracy.

The other brokers didn’t need to turn off the buy button because they didn’t extent free credit to anyone with a pulse

That’s a graphic produced for public consumption not the official count of the election.

There is no way to do it and I don’t think they’ll be able to add a way without unanimous support.

Countries cannot be kicked out from the EU.

Ukraine is cooked, with a divided France and a Trump presidency it’s all but over.

His chances at the next presidential elections are zero because he can’t run again. Whatever is in that article changes nothing.

Impressive how you write with total conviction, yet are utterly wrong.

Once I saw this guy on a bridge about to jump. I said, “Don’t do it!” He said, “Nobody loves me.” I said, “Marx loves you, do you believe in Marx?”

He said, “Yes.” I said, “Are you a Socialist or an Anarchist”? He said, “A Socialist.” I said, “Me, too! Democratic Socialist or actual Communist?” He said, “Actual Communist.” I said, “Me, too! What school?” He said, “Marxism.” I said, “Me, too! Revolutionary Marxism or Reformist Marxism?” He said, “Revolutionary Marxism.” I said, “Me, too! Revolutionary Marxism-Leninism or Revolutionary Marxism-Troskyism?” He said “Revolutionary Marxism-Leninism.” I said, “Me, too! Revolutionary Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, or Revolutionary Marxism-Leninism-Hoxhaism?” He said, “Revolutionary Marxism-Leninism-Maoism.” I said, “Me, too! Regular Revolutionary Marxism-Leninism-Maoism or Revolutionary Marxism-Leninism-Maoism-Gonzalo Thought?” He said, “Revolutionary Marxism-Leninism-Maoism-Gonzalo Thought.”

I said, “Die, liberal!” and pushed him off.

What does that have to do with anything?