LINSEY DAVIS: There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it’s born. Madam vice president, I want to get your response to President Trump.
VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: Well, as I said, you’re going to hear a bunch of lies.
Narcissist, jealous of other people getting the limelight. His post is a perfect example of how he would have been in so much of a better spot now had he hired PR people to help him control his urges to say stuff, but I guess that itself goes against the personality ego.
“Rigged” is a consistent word he uses when he doesn’t get his way. Let’s not forget that what he says is also a projection, so he’s totally going to try and “rig” the election where he can to give himself any advantages. And then on a loss will throw anything he can at the system to claim once again that he was cheated.
All his talking didn’t help him at all. I don’t think the Harris side cared about him self-destroying his image and giving lots for the talk shows later to make fun of.
I’m in a US state that is known for actively suppressing black populations from voting in all sorts of ways, including the bogus voter ID laws. I’ll say it again, there was never a problem of voter fraud before voter ID laws, so they are a made up solution for a non-issue, designed to discourage minorities. You replied to me elsewhere “Just get an ID.” If things were that simple, then this tactic wouldn’t work and there wouldn’t be laws in place to try and control voting.
The voter suppression is coming from the same ones who are selling the fix.
Or just not require an ID since there’s no issue needing it. But I guess you missed all that with your non sequitur and angry ranting.
If she had done the hand gesture like Obama did…
“Generated by AI”
Some places have made or are trying to make that not valid. No, it doesn’t make sense until you realize that disrupting voting is all they have.
As for Voter ID laws…if it’s true that you can show up with an ID that doesn’t match yourself and vote…almost seems like the Voter ID law isn’t necessary, and is an extra step thrown up to discourage people of certain demographics from voting. I say almost seems in jest, as that’s exactly why they (meaning Republicans in control of those areas) passed those laws. There never was voter fraud of any significance.
More importantly, she was waiting for the best time to do it. I would hate to be the guy who has to tell Trump.
Me? I’m a planner. You know? I make plans.
You’ve already made the plan, so what value do you have now?
If, uh, the plan fails… the existing plan… I make a new plan.
So you make plans that fail.
Can’t wait for Trump’s reaction. I guess the pictures of support for him were fake, huh?
Yes, a dead heat so far. Zero votes cast for each. Stay tuned and vote.
We already knew this before, I think we were just hoping that it would bounce back some or we’d stop doing what we do. A fool’s hope.
A full sweep. I don’t know if it’s possible this election (i.e. who is running) but the numbers need to change to enable progress.
That would be huge. Then the debate is back to what is a “livable wage”, and how can you calculate it for differing areas. It would be nice to have constructive arguments again.
My opinion is to break it up, have an overall federal, then state, then urban. Same with any type of UBI scenario since no one thing is going to fit all needs.
It won’t be enough, it never will, but at least it raises it in the few states that have less than or no minimum. I’m guessing Georgia and Wyoming still have a lesser minimum because it just wasn’t worth the effort to change the laws.
The meme is incomplete. Instead of the fourth panel with the realization, you open up a new meme with a different objection. And it repeats, over and over.
Would the main MAGA group shift to support her? I don’t think you can just switch out cult leaders like that. How would she do with policy vs. Harris? What would be fascinating is having a race where someone is going to be the first woman President, regardless, so that is removed from the reasons for voting for them - which it shouldn’t be…I want someone who can be a leader, period. And for what it’s worth, Trump could have been a leader (not a great one, but one still), he got a few chances during his term, even soft ball ones. And he failed them all.
I understand undecided by being hesitant about Harris, especially Republicans who for years have voted for party because that’s what you’re told to do. I can’t see anyone flipping from diehard Trump to Harris, that ship sailed a long time ago. Then there’s the undecided who have been apathetic about voting in general for good reasons, which is probably a large part of the group. We have a lot of people in this country who could vote but never do.