MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]

Just bog standard racism/yellow peril

This thread is fucking littered with comrades begging you to read, but you just sit there and say “doesn’t look like anything to me” like it’s Westworld or some shit and then keep on bashing us. It’s amazing, truly.

We don’t outright dismiss them you dip. We engage with your sources and show why they’re unreliable or non-factual. You’re the one handwaving sources away and refusing to engage any further. Talk about a bubble around you.

My guy read your own fucking source. Your UN paper doesn’t even conclude that China is engaging in Genocide.

I’ll add to this - the Holocaust museum features prominently the testimony and picture of Rushan Abbas. She has a long history of activism in China (the details of which are important but we have more immediate concerns), and that lead to a career with… Radio Free Asia… Oh look, there we have another CIA/State Department mouthpiece.

I will further critique the source and echo another commenter saying that they don’t have a single link. That page tells a story, but it does not provide any direct sources other than testimony from activists with demonstrable links to RFA.

Chad

Quick question: did you know about any of this before today? Did you know about the Maidan Coup? Did you know about the nearly 15,000 casualties, including over 3000 civilian casualties, in Luhansk/Donbas between 2014 and 2022? Were you aware of the extensive reporting by western sources on far right elements in Ukraine committing crimes against humanity?

If any of that was news to you, do you think it’s ever appropriate to pause and reassess your position? Or are you just going to double, triple, and quadruple down on your fairy-tale understanding of the world with smug quips that don’t address anything of substance?

Lmao imagining this nerd immediately being ventilated because “the soldiers feared for their life.”

Okay, then vet the sources big guy.

Great, so you admit that all you have are the sources previously provided and the inherent flaws they contain We’re operating from a point of agreement, then! We do not have strong evidence for the claims being made.