![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
The real world.
The real world.
I still reckon we should all just refer to him as “Thirty Four”.
Let’s not forget he stole an election with the help of a corrupt Republican governor and the Supreme Court, either.
Oh yeah, it’s easy enough to beat one you know how.
Yes, thanks to moderators who abuse the system, and lazy admins who don’t hold them to account.
Reddit uses fingerprinting techniques to track you across accounts. You need to look into defeating these tactics in order to successfully register (and keep) a new account.
Change browser, block html canvas, change IP address, etc. Also time plays a factor. Leave it a couple of weeks.
Or, recognise that Reddit has become completely overrun with shitposting bots and has little in the way of interesting content to offer these days, and move on.
The law: Do what we say, don’t challenge us, give us all your wealth, we can change the law at any time.
This isn’t new. Reddit mods have been like this for a decade or more. And the admins let them get away with it because they get free labour from them.
Yeah, it has the same initials as “Atlassian Intelligence”. It could really confuse people.
Today it’s immigrants and trans people.
This isn’t even remotely ambiguous. The DoJ’s interpretation is correct.
The question isn’t really about the meaning of “and”; it’s about the syntactic structure of the whole section.
A defendant is eligible if they do NOT have (A and B and C). In other words, having any of A, B or C will disqualify them.
The law could have been written in a more readable fashion, for example:
the defendant—
- (A) does not have more than 4 criminal history points…;
- (B) does not have a prior 3-point offense…; and
- © does not have a prior 2-point violent offense…
But the meaning is the same either way. Amazing that this got to the Supreme Court.
It’s also entirely plausible that this is exactly what was intended when the law was written.
Bonus points if you use an LLM to generate said illegible nonsense.
For web browsing? No.
Well, with their track record…
ADHD is definitely a possibility. I have it and can relate to those issues. However stress, anxiety and fatigue can also cause problems like this without there being an underlying condition like ADHD. Definitely agree on seeking professional help though, if that’s possible.
For a while there I thought “moved to Belarus” was going to become the new “fell from a window”, but I guess they’ve decided to stick with tradition.
I miss mid-90s IRC. That was far more social than any ‘social’ media I’ve experienced since.
In my experience, influencers are people who:
And about a million other things I can’t think of right now.
In short, they’re among the most awful people around. You really don’t need a more insulting term.
Wouldn’t want them anywhere that is prone to earthquakes - the entire Pacific rim, for example.
$10 says it wouldn’t show on the screenshot anyway.
“Influencer”