Limitless_screaming

Much better than a government that gets its weapons from the enemy and is only allowed to point it towards their own citizens.

https://piped.video/watch?v=GeEISHh37lY

All the people sharing the same past with those countries have somewhat similar views of them because of their past interactions with each other.

Such a loss. Who will pay for that to be cleaned off the sidewalk now?

Yes, but not for himself.

You cannot pass off women and children dying as Hamas casualties. At least not as easily as adult men.

The entire response was actually responding to your comment, and one side note was added to address your great spelling. You went for the side note.

had a side job as a commander in Hamas’s anti-tank missile units until 2022

1. Not even relevant to recent events.
2. Anti-tank missiles are probably self defense, or at worst resistance.
3. “evidence retrieved by the IDF revealed”

it still is true this was written before today.

I didn’t even imply that it wasn’t. Doesn’t change the fact that they lied before and will lie again.

Israel claims that Hamas is using Al-Shifa to store weapons - Video suggests IDF might have rearranged weaponry at Al-Shifa prior to news crew visits

Israel claims a tunnel ran through a cemetry - Israeli commanders failed to prove their claim during a three-hour visit to the Bani Suheila cemetery and the surrounding area.

Israel claims the UNRWA is involved directly with Hamas in Gaza - ???

Can’t she just wither away peacefully.

Why do you have a problem with a word?

^^^ look guys, a prime case of definitely not bait or trolling ^^^

He fall out of window on 13th of march, will be tragic, will be missed.

الشعب يريد؟. Well, it seems like the time has come for the Palestinians to raise their flag instead of the Hamas one. Oh, silly me, they actually cannot; they’re under “the IDF’s protection” currently. They will stay under their protection after Hamas falls too. Their natural resources and land will be protected with them to starve the Hamas regime forever.

That’s one reason for my support of the boycott. Additionally, getting accused of supporting Israel should feel like the crime it is. Even firms just relating to you or using your brand should feel the weight of their crime.

People should be seeking local alternatives to the products they use even if this whole massacre wasn’t going on; We have a hell of a lot more control over local companies than we have over some company in the US or Germany.

Talk and talk and talk, but when you get a chance to talk, say “no thanks, I already can talk”.

Some boycotted products have plummeted in price here, and alternatives have taken their place on the shelves. Some stores and people did use this to buy them in bulk, but if this boycott isn’t forgotten like the past ones, then supporting Israel may become a taboo. We may also get more statements like the McDonald’s CEO statement clarifying that the middle east franchise is separate from the US one. And maybe more pathetic sights like this one:

Many McDonald’s operators in the region quickly distanced themselves from the Israeli operator’s actions. Franchise groups in Kuwait, Pakistan and other countries issued statements saying they did not share ownership with the Israeli franchise, and some of those franchises noted they have made financial donations to aid those in Gaza.

I doubt they don’t. When it’s just for the election, future human rights abuses and even attempts at genocide aren’t gonna be met with any response or condemnation.

So it’s just a delay of direct assault, and not even gonna effect the indirect ways Israel makes Palestine unlivable.

Removed by mod

Yes, most people would consider “needless deaths of civilians while causing more terrorism” a pretty significant downside.

Realistically speaking: the people were furious after the attack took place, telling them that you can do nothing about it is a pretty bad idea. Besides, these side effects could have been avoided if they weren’t the main objective of the IDF.

Of course, but “something” ≠ military action.

What is it then?

Fixed that for you

That could have been done in the past. Imagine Israel giving aid to Gaza right after Hamas attacked them, LOL. And to address your last point: I meant Israel never wanted a stable Gaza, not the Palestinians themselves.