![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
the real enemies of this war are not the Jews or the Israelis or the Palestinians. It’s those people who have decided that violence is the only answer.
Unpopular opinion. Wouldn’t a one state be a better solution. Like most of other developed nations that are multi cultural? After 5 or 6 generations they would all identify as one nation with different backgrounds. It definitely works in modern nations now.
What is hamas thinking
So you don t like it? Make up your mind
Rota genuinely had no idea either from what I understand. Conspiracy is that a plant planned this.
Time is all relative anyway. Do we even know how fast the Milky Way is going and in which direction?
Disappearing doesn’t mean killling. It could just be forced retirement with an nda
I doubt it’s that simple. Imagine we had a United States of Africa now that backed Russia. Would the world be more or less stable? I have no idea except that Libya would be more stable.
Sounds exactly like when cameras started being added on phones. There was a lot of people complaining as well.
I guess half of it is not having the foresight to see it’s potential.
deleted by creator
Too risky depending on your destination. What if there is a plane delay, what if there is no food for your baby, what if they don’t sell the food your baby is used to etc etc. usually just the baby stuff takes a while checkin luggage, not to mention the stroller.
China bashing aside how likely is the us engaging in tech espionage of foreign countries? Are there any merit in the statement below? (Serious replies only)
“Measures are believed to be aimed at eliminating perceived national security risks from telecoms devices made by a US company”
So Britain is in a sunk cost fallacy situation? If so who exactly in power is preventing us to rejoin?
You mean like manual work that can be automated?
That’s short sighted. Developers collude with each other and investors. There is serious conflict of interest since everyone on the supply side has lots to gain in ever rising house prices.
Ironically getting rid or severely limiting these developers to reduce supply is what’s needed to reduce prices. Not short term, but the long hard way until you take away the “investment “ side of real estate. Lower supply until it’s not profitable for these developers and investors.
Another take is that it’s the developers who is to blame for the high prices. What would happen if they stopped buying land? Short term? Disaster, no new houses, prices sky rocket. Long term? With no new supply investors and foreign buyers will just leave the market since it’s not making money. As they leave, more supply will be available for the normal people.
why not develop the rural areas to attract more people there, wouldn’t that be a win-win-win for the dems, conservatives and the actual populace there?
Wouldn’t they just speak renaissance English?