![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/c7e74aaf-fd1c-480f-a98e-da2a7a7e55e4.jpeg)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/8140dda6-9512-4297-ac17-d303638c90a6.png)
Probably not; I’d expect the places where you need something like UUIDv7 (large, eventually-consistent systems) to not be entirely suitable because you can have records added out of sequence. You’d have to add a received-at field - but in that case you may as well just use a standard incrementing ID as your primary key.
Patrick Delaney’s salute:
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/22668a2b-ef24-46f7-bb3a-75313e5215d2.webp)
I know News Corp are evil, but this pic looks more mocking than heartfelt.