Putting international pressure on Taiwan to declare independence is not openly supporting them.
Putting international pressure on Taiwan to declare independence is not openly supporting them.
The math would mean they have labeled every post-pubescent boy as Hamas.
I would think combative is closer to your connotation and adversarial is judgement neutral.
Rios, sitting in the backseat of the police cruiser, turned his tirade against Officer Alexander Welch, an English-born American citizen, as the lawmaker pointed out the officer’s accent and bizarrely claimed that he doesn’t think “people from England should be arresting Americans.”
“Your country is being overtaken by f–king migrants and refugees, right?” Rios asked, citing the refugee crisis in England.
“You’re arresting me for driving home. But people come into your country and rape your women. And I’m the f–king bad guy? I’m going to fight for the people of England more than you ever would, you little bitch.”
Not in US though
Anger is clearly not an emotion /s
I’ve been registered to vote in blue and red states and the barriers to vote in red states are so much higher. Lines are longer, in less convenient locations, registration has to be done earlier, and sometime they might not count your vote or purge a voter directory and you have to check yourself to see if that the case so you can correct it. It’s more than people can’t be arsed to vote; it is intentionally made as inconvenient as possible.
I’m just a simple statistican, but I would be more worried about sun exposure, tap water quality, air quality, processed foods and occupational hazards (depending on job) over 3-4 drinks per year.
The better conclusion is “people who drink in moderation have a decreased risk of cancer”, which is different. Causation is hard to prove, especially when we can only ethically do observational studies. It’s likely that people who drink in moderation are more likely to make healthy choices in other areas of their life or have other factors that reduce risk.
I understand your conclusion, but in my experience not many people are advocating for reducing their 1st amendment rights. The majority of my experience with people claiming free speech is when it doesn’t apply. Like it does not protect anyone from being laughed at, ostracized, does not force people to buy goods or services from someone who says wild shit, and no one is required to give them a platform.
People only invoke the feelings of the founders when they either don’t have a stronger argument or are trying to appeal to conservatives. It’s basically religious interpretation at this point - mostly used to manipulate people who don’t know better.
I think weak labor protections for a people that commonly live paycheck to paycheck with health insurance from those jobs, poor social programs should they lose those jobs and a police force that has a robust history of violently shutting down protests might also have a hand
Fuck em. I’ll use nebula.
I bought Subnautica today to play for the first time and I’m trying to decide between playing it on steam deck or blow some cobwebs off the vive.
Either you went to a highly atypical drag show or a strip club without stripping. I think having a work-sponsored drag show is inappropriate and bit cringe, but it’s not more risqué than cabaret.
Doesn’t help that she was a prosecutor in California during three strikes. She’s basically a cop.
Because they haven’t had issues moderating kbin users. The big issue is they felt that the amount of time they way too much spent modding those two instances
I also agree with making a NSFL tag, but some things are NSFW without being straight up porn.
Maybe lemmygrad, but Beehaw is hardly radical because they did a temporary defederation because they didn’t have the manpower to deal with users breaking their community rules.
It’s also a live telephone poll. This type of pole has a lot of trouble getting a representative sample of people under the age of 40.